Suppose you have to resolve the issue of Kashmir

Suppose you have to resolve the issue of Kashmir - Printable Version

+- Accountancy Forum (https://www.accountancy.com.pk/forum)
+-- Forum: General (https://www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/forum-general)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (https://www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/forum-general-discussion)
+--- Thread: Suppose you have to resolve the issue of Kashmir (/thread-suppose-you-have-to-resolve-the-issue-of-kashmir)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

- abdulmajid - 05-04-2005

<blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by speaker

by the way, are you a Jew, brother Goodman?

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
ooooooooo[D] why i didn't thought this before, speaker!! u are really acting like delhi people. he he he !!!!!!

akhbarak eih habibbie??

- abdulmajid - 05-04-2005

<blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by speaker
 gangis khan was no "average person". he longed for a competetive foe. this was his nature and his mind demanded it. india was nothing like a foe gangis khan wanted to waste his time with. so it was irrelevent to him.

you can't be assuming that he stayed away because he was afraid of "indians"?

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
india was always a big economy, especially under muslim rulers!! so it had a lot to offer to mongols. and security wise khwarzimian empire was no match to that of altamash and later balban. i had read somewhere balban had established many strong forts on the borders. his technique was to weaken the adversaries as much as possible before they reach the mainland.

akhbarak eih habibbie??

- khurram_shahid - 05-05-2005

SALAM

ABOUT THE KASHMIR DISPUTE i have to say something

1) The Kashmir included all the part of Azad Kashmir, Narthren Areas, Jammu, LAddakh and Kashmir should be a independent state

2) If i have a chance to resolve it i will give freedom to all Kashmiries to make their independent country

*********************
WISH YOU ALL THE BEST
*****Allah Hafiz*****
KHURRAM JAMAL SHAHID(MBA)
***ISLAMABAD PAKISTAN***

- tooogoood - 05-06-2005

hi
i would like kashmiris to have their own right to make their own deceisions
thanku

- Pracs - 05-06-2005

<blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by khurram_shahid
 SALAM

ABOUT THE KASHMIR DISPUTE i have to say something

1) The Kashmir included all the part of Azad Kashmir, Narthren Areas, Jammu, LAddakh and Kashmir should be a independent state

2) If i have a chance to resolve it i will give freedom to all Kashmiries to make their independent country

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

Not commenting on the Kashmir option as yet, but I'd like to clear the fact that Northern Areas (Including Chitral, Gilgat & Skardu (Baltistan) and Laddakh) have never been part of Kashmir as such. These were all independant states who paid taxes and retainers to the British and to the Dogras. The moment the Dogra Mahraja went against his words and signed the assession treaty with Nehru (Post Jinnah's death), states of Chitral and Baltistan announced their assession to Pakistan (despite the fact that they had no legal rights under the partition plan of 1947)and lead their private armies along with the local populace and the Tribal pathans to liberate Muslim lands from India,. The ordinary Kasmiri people (excluding a few exceptions) did not participate in this struggle, especially from the 'VALLEY', many in those times considered this to be an invasion from the Tribals/Pathans and seemed fit not to side with them if not against them.

These people are not Kashmiri ethnically, nor is their language. Nor do the people in this area 'wish to be part of an Independant Kashmir'

If and When we talk about Independant Kashmir, this would mean 'Azad Kashmir' and the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir. Let there be no doubt about it.

"Allah does not change the state of people unless they change what is within themselves" Quran 1311

- Shahid_fss - 05-07-2005

<blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by tooogoood
 hi
i would like kashmiris to have their own right to make their own deceisions
thanku
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

Agreed;
No better solution then this.

========================
```*``` I love stars;
*`*`*`* Shining;
`*`*`*` and Smiling;
*`````* Always.
------------------------
[email protected]
http//www.shahid-fss.tk
========================

- khurram_jamal - 05-10-2005

[8D]I THINK KASHMIR SHOULD BE PART/ PROVINCE OF PAKISTAN[8D]

IF NOT [ Wink

]then i think

IT SHOULD BE COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT A MUSLIM STATE /COUNTRY as according to the will of KASHMIRI PEOPLE.

IF i have given a chance to resolve this i surely give independence/ Freedom to all Kashmiries so that they may have a Free/ Independent Muslim Country

------------------------------------------------------------
*REMEMBER****GOD HELPS THOSE WHO HELPS THEMSELVES****

WISH YOU ALL THE BEST

KHURRAM JAMAL KHAN (MBA)(CA-Module-C)

- khurram_jamal - 05-10-2005

ITS A BIG BLUNDER NOT A MISTAKE

Northern Areas (Including Chitral, Gilgat & Skardu (Baltistan) and Laddakh) have never been part of Kashmir as such.

Its totally rong as above your quotition.

BAsically Whole KASHMIR comprises of

1) Occupied JAmmau & Kashmir (Velley, JAmmu etc)(Occupied by India)
2) Azad Jammu & KAshmir
3) Northren Areas (Faderally administrated)
4) Ladakh,
5) Baltistan, Kohistan Chitral et
6) SOme part occupied by CHINA

SO PLEASE DONT SAY AGAIN THIS AND FISRT STUDY OF THE HISTORY

THANKS

------------------------------------------------------------
*REMEMBER****GOD HELPS THOSE WHO HELPS THEMSELVES****

WISH YOU ALL THE BEST

KHURRAM JAMAL KHAN (MBA)(CA-Module-C)

- Pracs - 05-11-2005

Here is a little history lesson, Khurram,.. Your toe line of the Northern Areas being part of Kashmir.. is the Indian stand as well,

http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilgit-Baltistan

Gilgit-Baltistan or the Northern Areas is the northernmost region of Pakistan, with a population of approximately 1.1 million. The entire area including Gilgit and Baltistan was known as the Gilgit Agency till October, 1947. This is a strategically very important region of the world, which is sandwiched between the high peaks of Hindukush and Karakorum on the north and those of western Himalaya on the south. It borders to the north with Afghanistan and China, to the south with India and Azad Kashmir and to the west with North-West Frontier, Pakistan.

Unlike the area that Pakistan calls "Azad Kashmir," the Northern Areas are incorporated into Pakistan. A small part of Northern Areas was ceded to China by Pakistan in 1963 with the proviso that the settlement was subject to the final solution of the Kashmir dispute. India does not recognize the Northern Areas as belonging to Pakistan and calls the region encompassing Azad Kashmir and the Northern Areas "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK)"

The region was under local rulers for many centuries. The rulers of Hunza were called Mirs, and those of Gilgit were called Raas. Some parts of the region were invaded by Maharajas of Kashmir and they forcefully governed the area for many years, which led to the common belief that it is a part of Kashmir. But the people of Gilgit-Baltistan regard themselves as being distinct from Kashmiris and many want to become the fifth province of Pakistan. And they oppose being included in Kashmir. Their opinion is that invasion of Mahrajas doesn't mean that this is a part of Kashmir, just like British invasion over the India in 19th century does not mean that India is a part of Britain. The region's lack of representation in the parliament of Pakistan has placed it outside the mainstream politics of the country, which has become a major cause of frustration to the inhabitants of Gilgit-Baltistan.

The Northern Areas comprise the two districts of Baltistan and the three districts of Gilgit (where the capital is located). Hunza, an independent principality for 950 years which only came under Pakistani rule in 1974, is also located in this region. The Northern Areas collectively comprise a territory of 27,991 miÂ² (72,496 kmÂ²).

Brushaski, an isolated language, is spoken in Hunza, Nagir, Yasin, some parts of Gilgit, and some villages of Punyal. Although Brushaski is most popular and polite language in the Area, it still is not used by a large portion of population. Shina with different accents or in different dialacts is the Language of over 40% of total population, spoken mainly in Gilgit, throughout Diamer, and most of the areas of Ghizr. Balti with a similar accent, is spoken by the entire population of Baltistan except some villages. There are also some other languages spoken in the area -- Wakhi is spoken in upper Hunza and some villages in Ghizr, and Khwar is spoken by some Khwar families in Ghizr. None of these languages are related to each other. Urdu is the Lingua franca of the Area. Urdu is understood by almost all men, and literate women.

According to Habib R. Sulemani the Northern Areas of Pakistan is commonly known as "Gilgit-Baltistan" and this term clearly indicates the districts of Gilgit, Ghizer, Diyamer, Skardu and Ganchay, while the term 'Northern Areas' confuses parts of the NWFP with Gilgit-Baltistan. Gilgit-Baltistan is geographically and politically more suitable than any other term

"Allah does not change the state of people unless they change what is within themselves" Quran 1311

- khurram_jamal - 05-11-2005

Hi Yar Actually you have read the History made by some one Pakistani.

Its a big reallity that the Northren Areas were the Part of Kashmir and still it is part of Kashmir. You please dont try to study only those who also don,t know about Kashmir.

I am again saying that all people of Northren Areas also know and they want to be with AzAD Kashmir as having a Free State of Kashmir

------------------------------------------------------------
*REMEMBER****GOD HELPS THOSE WHO HELPS THEMSELVES****

WISH YOU ALL THE BEST

KHURRAM JAMAL KHAN (MBA)(CA-Module-C)

- Pracs - 05-12-2005

Khurram, this is not history, Hunza officialy accepted Pakistan's soverignity some 30 years ago, I think its more of current affairs !. I am sure you can find some one around who can attest to that fact. There is nothing on this that is cooked up. The site is not a Pakistani site,.. have you even read this page at all ? oh I see you were like too busy posting one liners under each and every topic on the forum. Then again I am not surprised because we get such members every now and then..... there is one each month now, actually.

I hope you stay on and and that I am able to convince you to some facts.

"Allah does not change the state of people unless they change what is within themselves" Quran 1311

- Shahid_fss - 05-12-2005

I was not bussy posting one liner posts (see my posting rate) but still I didn't know it was not a Pakistani site.
Pracs!
Can you explain / tell me more about it.

========================
```*``` I love stars;
*`*`*`* Shining;
`*`*`*` and Smiling;
*`````* Always.
------------------------
[email protected]
http//www.shahid-fss.tk
========================

- khurram_jamal - 05-12-2005

HELLO PRACS

YOU ARE TOTALLY WRONG YOU MEAN THAT I USE FORUM ONLY FOR POSTING UNUSELESS THINGS. ITâS REALLY YOUR OWN COMMENTS NA????? OK NO PROBLEM

BUT ON THE KASHMIR AFFAIR I REALLY DO NOT ACCEPT ANY THING WHICH IS WRONGLY MADE A PART OF HISTORY. YOU ARE TELLING ME THE HISTORY BEFORE 30 YEARS BUT I AM TALKING ABOUT THE OLD HISTORY BEFORE 1947 AND AFTER 1947

BUT YOU CAN SAY ONLY THIS THAT THE PEOPLE OF AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR, NORTHREN AREAS HAD GET FREEDOM AFTER A HOT WAR AGAINST INDIAN TO LIVE WITH AND BE PART OF PAKISTAN. SO THEY WANT TO BE PART OF PAKISTAN IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT ITS IS THE INITIALLY PAKISTAN COME INTO EXIST WITH THE OTHER PARTS OF PAKISTAN. SO YOU MAY UNDERSTAND THAT THESE ARE WHOLLY A KASHMIR WHICH MIGHT TO BE GREAT PROVINCE OF PAKISTAN.

PLEASE DONâT TRY TO STUDY FROM THE NON-HISTORIAN PEOPLE WHO HAVE NO FACT AND NOTHING. THEY ONLY DO THE WORK BY CUT COPY AND PASTE.

THANKS

----------------------------------------------------------------
*REMEMBER****GOD HELPS THOSE WHO HELPS THEMSELVES****

WISH YOU ALL THE BEST

KHURRAM JAMAL SHAHID (MBA)(CA-Module-C)

- Pracs - 05-14-2005

<blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by Shahid_fss
 I was not bussy posting one liner posts (see my posting rate) but still I didn't know it was not a Pakistani site.
Pracs!
Can you explain / tell me more about it.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

As far as I remember I never said anything about you buddy,,.. it was for Khurram, as the post said,

- Pracs - 05-14-2005

<blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by khurram_jamal
 [green]HELLO PRACS

YOU ARE TOTALLY WRONG YOU MEAN THAT I USE FORUM ONLY FOR POSTING UNUSELESS THINGS. ITâS REALLY YOUR OWN COMMENTS NA????? OK NO PROBLEM<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

Am well, that is what it seemed,, well,. its not all that important. Just making my point there, you may choose to not agree or likewise, all right with me. As long as you know what I have to say !

<blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">BUT ON THE KASHMIR AFFAIR I REALLY DO NOT ACCEPT ANY THING WHICH IS WRONGLY MADE A PART OF HISTORY. YOU ARE TELLING ME THE HISTORY BEFORE 30 YEARS BUT I AM TALKING ABOUT THE OLD HISTORY BEFORE 1947 AND AFTER 1947<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

You fail to understand, it is not history that we are discussing here, these things have happened in the near past, so we have more than history books to tell us whau happened ! We can not agree how good a King Akbar was or if Asoka was as able a King as they say he was. But about Kashmir, we have every thing on the table, now don't we ?

<blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">BUT YOU CAN SAY ONLY THIS THAT THE PEOPLE OF AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR, NORTHREN AREAS HAD GET FREEDOM AFTER A HOT WAR AGAINST INDIAN TO LIVE WITH AND BE PART OF PAKISTAN. SO THEY WANT TO BE PART OF PAKISTAN IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT ITS IS THE INITIALLY PAKISTAN COME INTO EXIST WITH THE OTHER PARTS OF PAKISTAN. SO YOU MAY UNDERSTAND THAT THESE ARE WHOLLY A KASHMIR WHICH MIGHT TO BE GREAT PROVINCE OF PAKISTAN.

PLEASE DONâT TRY TO STUDY FROM THE NON-HISTORIAN PEOPLE WHO HAVE NO FACT AND NOTHING. THEY ONLY DO THE WORK BY CUT COPY AND PASTE.
*<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

I didn't completely understand what you meant up there ? care to explain. If you meant that a whole united Kashmir would like to part of Pakistan as a bigger and better province, I agree with you all the way. Only that I think that Gilgit-Baltistan should be designated as the fifth province prehand with proportional representation in the National Assembly and the Senate. They are a different people and should like wise be a different province. I also believe that other provinces in Pakistan should also be broken down into various provinces for better administration and better representation (for the various ethinc people).

"Allah does not change the state of people unless they change what is within themselves" Quran 1311