Suppose you have to resolve the issue of Kashmir

Suppose you have to resolve the issue of Kashmir - Printable Version

+- Accountancy Forum (https://www.accountancy.com.pk/forum)
+-- Forum: General (https://www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/forum-general)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (https://www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/forum-general-discussion)
+--- Thread: Suppose you have to resolve the issue of Kashmir (/thread-suppose-you-have-to-resolve-the-issue-of-kashmir)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

- muhammad awais - 05-16-2005

just freedom of Kashmir

- eShA - 05-17-2005

hi

may i suggest one good solution

make decision as the kashmiri wants

regards,

Â«Â·Â´`Â·.(*Â·.Â¸(`Â·.Â¸ Â¸.Â·Â´)Â¸.Â·*).Â·Â´`Â·Â»
Â«.......... esha ..........Â»
Â«Â·Â´`Â·.(Â¸.Â·*(Â¸.Â·Â´ `Â·.Â¸)*Â·.Â¸).Â·Â´`Â·Â»

- Shahid_fss - 05-17-2005

<blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by Pracs
 <blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by Shahid_fss
 I was not bussy posting one liner posts (see my posting rate) but still I didn't know it was not a Pakistani site.
Pracs!
Can you explain / tell me more about it.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

As far as I remember I never said anything about you buddy,,.. it was for Khurram, as the post said,
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

That's alright I knew that was for Khurram.
Well you didn't answered my question and I am still wating.

========================
```*``` I love stars;
*`*`*`* Shining;
`*`*`*` and Smiling;
*`````* Always.
------------------------
[email protected]
http//www.shahid-fss.tk
========================

- khurram_afzal - 05-17-2005

ABOUT THE KASHMIR DISPUTE

AS ACCORDING TO MUJAHID AWAAL SARDAR ABDUL QAYOOM KHAN (KASHMIRI LEADER)

THAT A UNITED STATE OF KASHMIR SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED WITH 7 UNITS

AND ALL OTHER KASHMIRIES ONLY WANT FOR FREEDOM. BUT I HAVE TO SAY THIS THAT ITS RAELLY NEED FRO THE TIME BEING THAT THE UNITED KASHMIR SHOULD BE COME INTO EXIST WITH 5 UNITS.

- Pracs - 05-18-2005

<blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by Shahid_fss
 <blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by Pracs
 <blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by Shahid_fss
 I was not bussy posting one liner posts (see my posting rate) but still I didn't know it was not a Pakistani site.
Pracs!
Can you explain / tell me more about it.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

As far as I remember I never said anything about you buddy,,.. it was for Khurram, as the post said,
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

That's alright I knew that was for Khurram.
Well you didn't answered my question and I am still wating.

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

Tell you more about what Shahid? just refresh me on that ?

- Pracs - 05-18-2005

<blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by khurram_afzal
 ABOUT THE KASHMIR DISPUTE

AS ACCORDING TO MUJAHID AWAAL SARDAR ABDUL QAYOOM KHAN (KASHMIRI LEADER)

THAT A UNITED STATE OF KASHMIR SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED WITH 7 UNITS

AND ALL OTHER KASHMIRIES ONLY WANT FOR FREEDOM. BUT I HAVE TO SAY THIS THAT ITS RAELLY NEED FRO THE TIME BEING THAT THE UNITED KASHMIR SHOULD BE COME INTO EXIST WITH 5 UNITS.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

Can you make a point for a free Kashmir,. seperate from Pakistan ? I don't understand why there is a need for the third option at all ?

- Aaitabar - 05-18-2005

SALAAAAAAAAAAM

I think firslty Kashmir should be Free as according to the Will of Kashmiries then they will decided theirself.

We can say nothing more in this aspect

~**AaiTabaR**~

- Pracs - 05-19-2005

and secondly ?? c'mon guys you can do better than that, one must have proper arguments to support one's point of view.

- abdulmajid - 05-19-2005

<blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> originally posted by pracs
Can you make a point for a free Kashmir,. seperate from Pakistan ? I don't understand why there is a need for the third option at all ?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
pracs! we have discussed this already under this topic. you can refer to http//www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2109&whichpage=2
as velley's accession to pakistan seems a bit impossible, then independent kashmir is definitely an option. whether somone likes it or not. btw i am a punjabi.
in pakistan, people who care for kashmiris want to resolve the kashmir issue immediately, even if it results in some losses to pakistani interests. but people who care for kashmir want the status-quo, and are asking to wait for the day when india is weak enough to be disintegrated. even if no kashmiri is left by that time.

akhbarak eih habibbie??

- Pracs - 05-20-2005

I think I know what your point of view is abdulmajid, we had a reasonable debate.. my question was was for Aaitbar and Khurram's one liners.

yeah independen kashmir is an option, but not the very best one and Kashmir ofcourse, not Gilgit-Baltistan

- khurram_afzal - 05-24-2005

<blockquote id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by Pracs
 yeah independen kashmir is an option, but not the very best one and Kashmir ofcourse, not Gilgit-Baltistan
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

HI PRACY !!! HOW YOU CAN SAY THIS YAR??? I THINK YOU HAVE READ THE HISTORY WRITTEN BY ANY HINDU OR SIKH. THIS IS THE HISTORY THAT ALL THESE ARE PART OF KASHMIR. AND NOW THE SITUATION IS RISED THAT THERE IS NO OPTION OTHER THEN THE INDEPENDENT KASHMIR COMPRISING 5 GREAT UNITS.

AS FOR AS BACKING OF PAKISTAN IN THIS REGARD IS TAOTALLY CONSIST OF SELF-PRPOSE. IF PAKISTAN IS SO SINCERE WITH MUSLIMS THEN WHY THEY DID NOT HELP THE AFGHANIES? WHY THEY SUPPORT TO USA AGAINST AFGHANISTAN??

Khurram

- cpa_guy - 06-07-2005

get rid of it. give it to india...not worth the hassle. It's ironic that we are supposedly so worried about our muslims brother dying in kashmir everyday while convienitly ignoring the numbers of ppl dying in our own country from simple reasons such as lack of clean water or quality health care

- Pracs - 06-07-2005

Its just not about the people, its about the ideology and the geographical/tactical importance of the Province. I agree that we need to save other muslim Pakistanis who are dying of poor health and crime, but the that's not where the buck stops, not yet, hopefully !

- cpa_guy - 06-08-2005

what is the ideology being followed? Kashmir does have the tactical importance though with all of our rivers flowing the province. But i'd still rather place my priorities on domestic problems first.

- Pracs - 06-08-2005

The ideology ofcourse being and maintaining that Kashmir is the unfinished agenda of the Partition plan. Of which all muslim majority provinces must be given the chance to vote and decide to become part of Pakistan or India.

Domestic issues fine, but somethings are far more important that just bread and better.