03-18-2006, 06:09 PM
(A) If Production Volume > Sales Volume, then
Profit under Absorption Costing > Profit under Marginal Costing
& it shows that there is a building-up of inventory/stock levels (or stocking).
(B) If Production Volume < Sales Volume, then
Profit under Absorption Costing < Profit under Marginal Costing
& it shows that there is a running-out of stocks (or destocking).
(C) If Production Volume = Sales Volume, then
Profit under Absorption Costing = Profit under Marginal Costing
& it shows that there is a constant/static inventory (or stocks) levels.
PROFITS RECONCILIATION STATEMENT-
PROFIT UNDER ABSORPTION COSTING TECHNIQUE
LESS
Closing Stock-AC
Opening Stock-MC
ADD
Closing Stock-MC
Opening Stock-AC
= PROFIT UNDER MARGINAL COSTING TECHNIQUE
«·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·»
«.......... A D N A N ...............»
«·´`·.(¸.·*(¸.·´ `·.¸)*·.¸).·´`·»
[email protected]
Profit under Absorption Costing > Profit under Marginal Costing
& it shows that there is a building-up of inventory/stock levels (or stocking).
(B) If Production Volume < Sales Volume, then
Profit under Absorption Costing < Profit under Marginal Costing
& it shows that there is a running-out of stocks (or destocking).
(C) If Production Volume = Sales Volume, then
Profit under Absorption Costing = Profit under Marginal Costing
& it shows that there is a constant/static inventory (or stocks) levels.
PROFITS RECONCILIATION STATEMENT-
PROFIT UNDER ABSORPTION COSTING TECHNIQUE
LESS
Closing Stock-AC
Opening Stock-MC
ADD
Closing Stock-MC
Opening Stock-AC
= PROFIT UNDER MARGINAL COSTING TECHNIQUE
«·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·»
«.......... A D N A N ...............»
«·´`·.(¸.·*(¸.·´ `·.¸)*·.¸).·´`·»
[email protected]