05-02-2006, 07:32 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Sahar_M</i>
<br /><font color="blue">uffff!!! wow wht a <b>perfect sample size</b> taken 32 out of 1494 ... tht makes 2.14% of the total Participating members(in the forum) AND if u take out of the total members (3017) .. I neednt mention but still â¦â¦â¦.. its 1.06 % of the total members
HA HA HA [o)][})]
*** wasay sajjad in which month were u born in ??? oh ! its mentioned above in April ... Y ant ANY ONE surprised ?? .. [P]</font id="blue">
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
In one of my earlier post I said that one of UK news paper took the sample of 1500 people (out of whole UK population) to predict the UK election result and they predict the result accurately. Now consider following-
UK total population (2001)
England 49,138,831 (83.6 per cent of the total population);
Scotland 5,062,011 (8.6 per cent);
Wales 2,903,085 (4.9 per cent); and
Northern Ireland 1,685,267 (2.9 per cent).
Total 58,789,194
The sample taken by the UK newspaper 1500 (in percentage term 0.003%) and my sample is 800 (about) times bigger than UK newspaper therefore you cant object on my chosen samples by its size.
Yon know why other more seniors members of this forum didnât object on the size of my sample? Because they know result depends on quality of samples not on quantity/numbers.
Assume you are auditing a bank and you need to check accuracy of its transaction. Bank has a millions transaction. How would you audit its transaction?â¦if I take your approach to audit the bank transaction than I need about 5 years to complete my work. But If I take my approach to audit the transaction than I would only select few transaction to assess the accuracy of its transaction.
The professionals say that if you have one million transaction to audit than 45 quality/good sample are enough to determine the accuracy of its transaction.
Now you can laugh other side of your face. hehehehehehe
one more thing...i dont know what month you born but i can bet that you didnt born in April......[D][D][D][D][D][D][D]
<br /><font color="blue">uffff!!! wow wht a <b>perfect sample size</b> taken 32 out of 1494 ... tht makes 2.14% of the total Participating members(in the forum) AND if u take out of the total members (3017) .. I neednt mention but still â¦â¦â¦.. its 1.06 % of the total members
HA HA HA [o)][})]
*** wasay sajjad in which month were u born in ??? oh ! its mentioned above in April ... Y ant ANY ONE surprised ?? .. [P]</font id="blue">
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
In one of my earlier post I said that one of UK news paper took the sample of 1500 people (out of whole UK population) to predict the UK election result and they predict the result accurately. Now consider following-
UK total population (2001)
England 49,138,831 (83.6 per cent of the total population);
Scotland 5,062,011 (8.6 per cent);
Wales 2,903,085 (4.9 per cent); and
Northern Ireland 1,685,267 (2.9 per cent).
Total 58,789,194
The sample taken by the UK newspaper 1500 (in percentage term 0.003%) and my sample is 800 (about) times bigger than UK newspaper therefore you cant object on my chosen samples by its size.
Yon know why other more seniors members of this forum didnât object on the size of my sample? Because they know result depends on quality of samples not on quantity/numbers.
Assume you are auditing a bank and you need to check accuracy of its transaction. Bank has a millions transaction. How would you audit its transaction?â¦if I take your approach to audit the bank transaction than I need about 5 years to complete my work. But If I take my approach to audit the transaction than I would only select few transaction to assess the accuracy of its transaction.
The professionals say that if you have one million transaction to audit than 45 quality/good sample are enough to determine the accuracy of its transaction.
Now you can laugh other side of your face. hehehehehehe
one more thing...i dont know what month you born but i can bet that you didnt born in April......[D][D][D][D][D][D][D]
