05-26-2006, 05:33 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Muhammad Ahmad</i>
<br />Dear shahid
Yes, these people have long been untouched with the training!!!!!
Wt will be your respnse if i let u know that i work in a Federal Govt Organization (PUblic Sector)? and let me also tell you that my working style is so much informal as it could be and all of the technique sugestted above r being used by me but results are nt as they could b............
Regards
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Well "Govt org" changes the situation;
[The only method to resolve such problem in Pakistan, and probably the most successful one, is âGOLDEN SHAKE HANDâ or do I say âKICK SHAKEâ but if it was a private company there could be various other solution like <b>introduction of some motivational schemes</b> and <b>converting to a learning type of culture to remove the generation gap, if not age than at least mental level</b>.]
<b>It seems that "ghee seedhi ungli sey naheen nikalney wala". We have to think about it negatively.</b>
In situation like this ppl like you (having better ideas and being superior) donât trust others any more. As a result they try to do all of the work by themselves (is not that true). So here comes the negative solution <b>(the delegation techneques).</b>
Try to avoid as much work as you can;
- Put all work burden on others
- Always act as "saas" considering others as "bahoo" (means tell them to do work quickly more efficiently and find mistakes in their work etc)
- Keep only risky work with yourself and enjoy life
This technique will surely work; as soon as the work load increases they will consult you. Try to guide them and offer your support too (say âok let me do the rest of workâ. why not since you where already doing this work). In this way they will take your advices and surely to reduce the work load they will value you.
I donât ask you to leave above methods and other if you are using some but add this too. Only leave those which are in conflict with this one.
<br />Dear shahid
Yes, these people have long been untouched with the training!!!!!
Wt will be your respnse if i let u know that i work in a Federal Govt Organization (PUblic Sector)? and let me also tell you that my working style is so much informal as it could be and all of the technique sugestted above r being used by me but results are nt as they could b............
Regards
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Well "Govt org" changes the situation;
[The only method to resolve such problem in Pakistan, and probably the most successful one, is âGOLDEN SHAKE HANDâ or do I say âKICK SHAKEâ but if it was a private company there could be various other solution like <b>introduction of some motivational schemes</b> and <b>converting to a learning type of culture to remove the generation gap, if not age than at least mental level</b>.]
<b>It seems that "ghee seedhi ungli sey naheen nikalney wala". We have to think about it negatively.</b>
In situation like this ppl like you (having better ideas and being superior) donât trust others any more. As a result they try to do all of the work by themselves (is not that true). So here comes the negative solution <b>(the delegation techneques).</b>
Try to avoid as much work as you can;
- Put all work burden on others
- Always act as "saas" considering others as "bahoo" (means tell them to do work quickly more efficiently and find mistakes in their work etc)
- Keep only risky work with yourself and enjoy life
This technique will surely work; as soon as the work load increases they will consult you. Try to guide them and offer your support too (say âok let me do the rest of workâ. why not since you where already doing this work). In this way they will take your advices and surely to reduce the work load they will value you.
I donât ask you to leave above methods and other if you are using some but add this too. Only leave those which are in conflict with this one.
