10-08-2007, 04:59 PM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by guybrush</i>
<br />If they are not .. then why do they get more high-paying jobs than accountants? What are their plus points?
In my opinion, there is no substitute for 4 years of the 'ragraa' of articleship.... but still MBAs are preferred. An MBA in finance who spends much less time doing MBA... and that too without any work experience (except for a few weeks of internship) is taken as an equal, and in some cases preferred over a CA for job positions?
Why?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
<font color="red"><b>Dear Its not matter, Basically in market they want for a professional person who have good experience.
2ndly the MBAs who have reference & Pawa may get goot job. I myself an MBA (Finance) and m Accounts Executive in FCC MFG Co, but getting salary only 30,000/=.</b></font id="red">
<br />If they are not .. then why do they get more high-paying jobs than accountants? What are their plus points?
In my opinion, there is no substitute for 4 years of the 'ragraa' of articleship.... but still MBAs are preferred. An MBA in finance who spends much less time doing MBA... and that too without any work experience (except for a few weeks of internship) is taken as an equal, and in some cases preferred over a CA for job positions?
Why?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
<font color="red"><b>Dear Its not matter, Basically in market they want for a professional person who have good experience.
2ndly the MBAs who have reference & Pawa may get goot job. I myself an MBA (Finance) and m Accounts Executive in FCC MFG Co, but getting salary only 30,000/=.</b></font id="red">
