12-30-2007, 05:41 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> M. Amir
Democracy, what you refer to as JAMHURIAT, neither is unislamic nor is a 'product' of the west.
Democracy is the government of the people, by the people and for the people.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Dear Astute please read once again above quoted lines, you said that Democracy is the Government of the people, by the people and for the people and you further added that it entitles a person to the freedom of speech, action and grants him/her the legitimate right, but Islam never give people Freedom to do whatever they want and hence Islam has imposed certain obligations on one person to be a 'Wali/Hakim/Ameer' this Wali hakim or ammer is not choosen by every one but this person has to be choosen by "Majlis-e-Shura" and this Majlis-e-Shura consists of people of knowledge(Ulema), Mohadeseen, Muhaqeqeen and the most nobel people thats why we call it as "SHURAIE System" and therefore Islam has Shuraie System not Democratic System...
In our religion there is no freedom of "Hawa-e-Hafs ki Peravee" and if we use democratic system and give every one right to choose his representative then majority of the votes casters will certainly not consist of most nobel people or people of knowledge aur yahin say kharabie shuru hoti hay...
The 'Bait' System you have pointed out was not similar to current voting system, in Bait system the Majlis-e-Shura decleare the person to be a Wali/Ameer of the certain area and this Wali or Ameer was not elected by people/neither he was accountable to people instead he was appointed by Majlis-e-Shura and he was accountable to Majlis however there was an opportunity for people of that particular area that they can register complains against Wali/Ameer if he was not working as per Shraiea Rulings...
Regards,
Muhammad Amir
Democracy, what you refer to as JAMHURIAT, neither is unislamic nor is a 'product' of the west.
Democracy is the government of the people, by the people and for the people.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Dear Astute please read once again above quoted lines, you said that Democracy is the Government of the people, by the people and for the people and you further added that it entitles a person to the freedom of speech, action and grants him/her the legitimate right, but Islam never give people Freedom to do whatever they want and hence Islam has imposed certain obligations on one person to be a 'Wali/Hakim/Ameer' this Wali hakim or ammer is not choosen by every one but this person has to be choosen by "Majlis-e-Shura" and this Majlis-e-Shura consists of people of knowledge(Ulema), Mohadeseen, Muhaqeqeen and the most nobel people thats why we call it as "SHURAIE System" and therefore Islam has Shuraie System not Democratic System...
In our religion there is no freedom of "Hawa-e-Hafs ki Peravee" and if we use democratic system and give every one right to choose his representative then majority of the votes casters will certainly not consist of most nobel people or people of knowledge aur yahin say kharabie shuru hoti hay...
The 'Bait' System you have pointed out was not similar to current voting system, in Bait system the Majlis-e-Shura decleare the person to be a Wali/Ameer of the certain area and this Wali or Ameer was not elected by people/neither he was accountable to people instead he was appointed by Majlis-e-Shura and he was accountable to Majlis however there was an opportunity for people of that particular area that they can register complains against Wali/Ameer if he was not working as per Shraiea Rulings...
Regards,
Muhammad Amir