Rate The Firms

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average

Rate The Firms

Paki
Offline

Member

Posts: 87
Threads: 4
Joined: May 2003
Reputation: 0

07-18-2003, 01:00 AM

my criteria for rating firms is on the quality of their working
1 - AFF
2 -
3 - FRSH
4 -
5 - THK

simply, it might make FRSH the number 2, but just to empasise the difference I've used the gaps, and after these 3, there's no such quality, so no ranking. Previously I'd have made it like this

1- AFF
2- SHQ
3-
4-
5- THK
6- FRRM

Me rulz

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 12 Guest(s)

Messages In This Thread

Rate The Firms - by geo - 07-13-2003, 07:58 AM

[No subject] - by smraza - 07-16-2003, 03:45 AM

[No subject] - by jbladeus - 07-17-2003, 08:44 PM

[No subject] - by Paki - 07-18-2003, 01:00 AM

[No subject] - by smraza - 07-18-2003, 03:50 AM

[No subject] - by Paki - 07-20-2003, 06:46 AM

[No subject] - by CBPian - 08-02-2003, 04:00 AM

[No subject] - by Muhammad Nauman - 08-02-2003, 10:56 PM

[No subject] - by smraza - 08-03-2003, 12:15 AM

[No subject] - by irfan - 08-19-2003, 12:27 PM

[No subject] - by irfan - 08-19-2003, 12:28 PM

[No subject] - by k.kamran - 03-01-2004, 10:38 PM

[No subject] - by Sarfaraz - 03-07-2004, 10:19 PM

[No subject] - by Tim - 03-18-2004, 05:26 PM

[No subject] - by smraza - 03-18-2004, 09:46 PM

[No subject] - by smraza - 03-18-2004, 09:50 PM

[No subject] - by muhammadali - 03-23-2004, 03:17 AM

[No subject] - by Moon - 04-10-2004, 07:22 PM

[No subject] - by ina - 04-11-2004, 05:09 PM

[No subject] - by derivativetrader - 04-11-2004, 10:08 PM

[No subject] - by Moon - 04-18-2004, 06:09 PM

[No subject] - by Moon - 04-18-2004, 06:12 PM

[No subject] - by ichor - 04-20-2004, 04:09 PM

[No subject] - by Moon - 04-24-2004, 05:42 PM