07-26-2004, 03:24 PM
<font face='Verdana'>
salaam all,
mr. abdusalam, i ve gone through ur reply, ur initial query, and the replies of all the members in its accordance. ur putting blame upon us, specially CAs, is unwarranted n unwanted. the problem lies in ur own initial query, n not in the members of this forum.
v r here to guide the ppl as much as v can, n NOT to hurt or mislead them. how come u know v r ACAs? specially, i ve explicitly mentioned it as well, to clear out ne coloring of biases.
thirdly, NO two ppl arround this planet will give u exactly the same advice. so, ur mentioning of this link, tht u gave us for comparision, is unethical n unwanted.
forthly, i ve read all the replies here n found not a single word tht should hurt ne1, let alone u.
finally, the problem lies in ur own initial query. it was ur responsibility to give us all the background of u, n all the contexts in which u need the reply. v r not sitting infront of an interview pannel to reply in YES or NO format. every problem has different solutions in different contexts. so, v r free to make ne assumptions for making decicions if u r not providing us. u shud've given us ur educational background, financial or other relavent info. all these clues r missing in ur query. so, ur putting blames upon us hakes no sense.
had u had told us these things in advance, instead of telling now, u could ve been given a wider range of options. eg, go for ICAEW, why ICAP?? or go for PhD in applied thermodynamics, or research in rocket science etc etc.
so, next time onwards, b specific n clear abt all the parameters of ur problem, n clear out ur mind from all the biases tht u carry at the moment. all of our members r helpful n cooperative.
i m sorry to write u in this way, but u deserve this treatment.
chaos for now!
</font id='Verdana'>
FARHAN
salaam all,
mr. abdusalam, i ve gone through ur reply, ur initial query, and the replies of all the members in its accordance. ur putting blame upon us, specially CAs, is unwarranted n unwanted. the problem lies in ur own initial query, n not in the members of this forum.
v r here to guide the ppl as much as v can, n NOT to hurt or mislead them. how come u know v r ACAs? specially, i ve explicitly mentioned it as well, to clear out ne coloring of biases.
thirdly, NO two ppl arround this planet will give u exactly the same advice. so, ur mentioning of this link, tht u gave us for comparision, is unethical n unwanted.
forthly, i ve read all the replies here n found not a single word tht should hurt ne1, let alone u.
finally, the problem lies in ur own initial query. it was ur responsibility to give us all the background of u, n all the contexts in which u need the reply. v r not sitting infront of an interview pannel to reply in YES or NO format. every problem has different solutions in different contexts. so, v r free to make ne assumptions for making decicions if u r not providing us. u shud've given us ur educational background, financial or other relavent info. all these clues r missing in ur query. so, ur putting blames upon us hakes no sense.
had u had told us these things in advance, instead of telling now, u could ve been given a wider range of options. eg, go for ICAEW, why ICAP?? or go for PhD in applied thermodynamics, or research in rocket science etc etc.
so, next time onwards, b specific n clear abt all the parameters of ur problem, n clear out ur mind from all the biases tht u carry at the moment. all of our members r helpful n cooperative.
i m sorry to write u in this way, but u deserve this treatment.
chaos for now!
</font id='Verdana'>
FARHAN
