08-12-2010, 08:36 PM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by kamranACA</i>
<br />aamalik
If this happens, the disparity among professionals will enhance and majority would not be able to part with the after effects. I have already discussed the expected after effects.
At the moment there is a factual disparity among the big 4 professionals, others in top ten or top 20 and the remaining firms mostly caused by concentration of quality clientele/business in the hands of top 20 firms, specially at big 4.
From disparity I mean the varying level of acceptability in market.
Non-disclosure of marks/grades is a blessing for majority, remember my words. If this happens, employers will top up the "disparity" by fixing certain percenatge of marks as a minimum as well (say 70-80 percent), curtailing down the positivity attached with this process. Must not forget that passing marks are only 5o percent and non-disclosure really creates equal competition, acceptability, grace and equal opportunities.
Although I have qualified way back, but would always oppose this change, if it comes my way for discussion.
Regards,
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
AoA Kamran Bhai,
I absolutely agree with what you said as it would open yet another front to classify CAs which I, personally, may not wish...
But do not you think this veil will have to be shed... All other professionals accept this as a legitimate segregation that 'top' performers deserve...
Notwithstanding the fact that disclosure or nondisclosure they will be up the pyramid, always...
Anyway, Kamran Bhai, what do u think are chances of this happening? and along with which firm one interns from, Isn't number of attempts another measure that employers use as judgement tool, or not really?
<br />aamalik
If this happens, the disparity among professionals will enhance and majority would not be able to part with the after effects. I have already discussed the expected after effects.
At the moment there is a factual disparity among the big 4 professionals, others in top ten or top 20 and the remaining firms mostly caused by concentration of quality clientele/business in the hands of top 20 firms, specially at big 4.
From disparity I mean the varying level of acceptability in market.
Non-disclosure of marks/grades is a blessing for majority, remember my words. If this happens, employers will top up the "disparity" by fixing certain percenatge of marks as a minimum as well (say 70-80 percent), curtailing down the positivity attached with this process. Must not forget that passing marks are only 5o percent and non-disclosure really creates equal competition, acceptability, grace and equal opportunities.
Although I have qualified way back, but would always oppose this change, if it comes my way for discussion.
Regards,
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
AoA Kamran Bhai,
I absolutely agree with what you said as it would open yet another front to classify CAs which I, personally, may not wish...
But do not you think this veil will have to be shed... All other professionals accept this as a legitimate segregation that 'top' performers deserve...
Notwithstanding the fact that disclosure or nondisclosure they will be up the pyramid, always...
Anyway, Kamran Bhai, what do u think are chances of this happening? and along with which firm one interns from, Isn't number of attempts another measure that employers use as judgement tool, or not really?
