09-04-2010, 02:29 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by kamranACA</i>
<br />
aamalik
I guess VITAL has given a very relevant and open clarification.
ICAP does not appear to intend differentiating between those who get 50% from the ones who are between 70% to 80% since such differentiation is not required. Of course extra ordinary people are awarded and Vital is rightly saying that such awards do not change market preferences at large.
When I entered this field, I heard a commonly used sentence "QUALIFICATION IS NEVER LATE". So, I witnessed a number of examples where this came true. On the contrary I could not see even ONE example where some one however late qualified was turned down for this reason.
The secret for the job of freshly qualified is, people feel, the one who qualified late is definitely more mature, experienced and trained than a 24 years qualified CA; and believe you me when we talk about job responsibilities this is always true. However, it does not mean that a young fellow is not upto the mark. Obviosly he has his own merits in comparison.
As far as job evaluation criteria for senior people is concerned, they watch it with reference to candidates' relevant exposure in similar positions. None of them even bothers to see the copies of your exam certificates. Those are required only for HR records. At such later stages, even the name of your mother firm does not remain your tag because so amny other tags are attached to your personalty by such time.
Hope you will understand.
Whether or not ICAP will change policy to disclose marks cannot be replied by me. Every where humans are working and a human is not free of errors or conceptual differences. However, if such a change will ever be discussed, there would be a majority to reject such a move. My guess!
Regards,
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Completely understood with gratitude, Kamran Bhai...
<br />
aamalik
I guess VITAL has given a very relevant and open clarification.
ICAP does not appear to intend differentiating between those who get 50% from the ones who are between 70% to 80% since such differentiation is not required. Of course extra ordinary people are awarded and Vital is rightly saying that such awards do not change market preferences at large.
When I entered this field, I heard a commonly used sentence "QUALIFICATION IS NEVER LATE". So, I witnessed a number of examples where this came true. On the contrary I could not see even ONE example where some one however late qualified was turned down for this reason.
The secret for the job of freshly qualified is, people feel, the one who qualified late is definitely more mature, experienced and trained than a 24 years qualified CA; and believe you me when we talk about job responsibilities this is always true. However, it does not mean that a young fellow is not upto the mark. Obviosly he has his own merits in comparison.
As far as job evaluation criteria for senior people is concerned, they watch it with reference to candidates' relevant exposure in similar positions. None of them even bothers to see the copies of your exam certificates. Those are required only for HR records. At such later stages, even the name of your mother firm does not remain your tag because so amny other tags are attached to your personalty by such time.
Hope you will understand.
Whether or not ICAP will change policy to disclose marks cannot be replied by me. Every where humans are working and a human is not free of errors or conceptual differences. However, if such a change will ever be discussed, there would be a majority to reject such a move. My guess!
Regards,
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Completely understood with gratitude, Kamran Bhai...
