03-08-2005, 08:43 PM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by naeem sarwar</i>
<br />Why less people are doing CIMA & more ACCA in pakistan?Although CIMA can do both jobs of AUDIT & Decision making while ACCA just only audit.IS CIMA is difficult or any other reason?
naeem
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
---It is rather interesting that you can make such statements, such Ad Hominem Abusive arguments, but I have heard much of the same from other members also. Is it possible that you could produce some argumentation -- some factual argumentation .
Naeem you should base your arguments on facts. Who said that ACCA's cant do decision making. Just go through the syllabes of 2.4, 3.7. I think it will clear your confusion. I dont think that CIMA qualifed can start there own Auditing firm. (I am not sure correct me if i am wrong). Nontheless your this argument against ACCA's is wrong as they can definately be involved in Decision Making.
As always, all your opinions must be supported - you should produce your evidence and explain why this evidence supports your point of view. It is important to distinguish between your claim (proposition, thesis) - your point of view, what you believe; your evidence (support or grounds) - the facts, data and examples that support your point of view - and your reasons (warrant or argument) - why you believe what you do, how the evidence you have provided leads to the claim your are making. Base your arguments on specific evidence not on assertion or generalization.
---------------------------------------------
If I could... Then I would... Turn back time!!
<br />Why less people are doing CIMA & more ACCA in pakistan?Although CIMA can do both jobs of AUDIT & Decision making while ACCA just only audit.IS CIMA is difficult or any other reason?
naeem
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
---It is rather interesting that you can make such statements, such Ad Hominem Abusive arguments, but I have heard much of the same from other members also. Is it possible that you could produce some argumentation -- some factual argumentation .
Naeem you should base your arguments on facts. Who said that ACCA's cant do decision making. Just go through the syllabes of 2.4, 3.7. I think it will clear your confusion. I dont think that CIMA qualifed can start there own Auditing firm. (I am not sure correct me if i am wrong). Nontheless your this argument against ACCA's is wrong as they can definately be involved in Decision Making.
As always, all your opinions must be supported - you should produce your evidence and explain why this evidence supports your point of view. It is important to distinguish between your claim (proposition, thesis) - your point of view, what you believe; your evidence (support or grounds) - the facts, data and examples that support your point of view - and your reasons (warrant or argument) - why you believe what you do, how the evidence you have provided leads to the claim your are making. Base your arguments on specific evidence not on assertion or generalization.
---------------------------------------------
If I could... Then I would... Turn back time!!
