Be a judge for a second

[sajjad_dar2000]

I think sawaira is somehow right here. Label and sarfaraz you dismissed her case without presenting the ground of dismissal. Mr. SMR highlighted a one solid point but didn’t give her right of appeal.

OK sawaira I write you a formal decision.

The case has been presented before me (Chief Justice Sajjad Ahmed Dar) on Dec 16 2004 at 114043 PM.


<u>CASE</u>
Somebody posted a message on accountancyforum.com….<i>http//www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1522</i> under the heading of Mrs. Sajjad_dar2000.

<u>Blame of Case</u>
Mr. Sajjad blamed Miss Sawira for the above post.

<u>Presentation of Case</u>
Miss Sawaira entered his case against Mr. Sajjad before the Court of accountancy.com and requested to punish him by suggesting him fine.



<u>Decision</u>

Judge Sajjad Ahmed dar
Jury SM Raza,Augustus,Label and Sarfaraz
Date Of Decision As appeared on top of this post.


We (jury and judge of accountancy forum) heard the DALAIL (Arguments) of Miss Sawaira and Mr. Sajjad and agreed to following decision.

Miss Sawira has been found guilty on the following basis

1) Nobody call Mr. Sajjad as sujoo except sawira. In the above post sujoo word has been used which is only known by sawaira.
2) Only sawaira call him in this name

Therefore its not a valid claim before me, Case dismissed.

You have right to appeal against this decision. You can enter your appeal in the High court within 14 days of this decision.




Chief Justice
Sajjad Ahmed Dar



Signature
<i>Sajjad Ahmed dar</i>