05-06-2005, 09:39 PM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by khurram_shahid</i>
<br />SALAM
ABOUT THE KASHMIR DISPUTE i have to say something
1) The Kashmir included all the part of Azad Kashmir, Narthren Areas, Jammu, LAddakh and Kashmir should be a independent state
2) If i have a chance to resolve it i will give freedom to all Kashmiries to make their independent country
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Not commenting on the Kashmir option as yet, but I'd like to clear the fact that Northern Areas (Including Chitral, Gilgat & Skardu (Baltistan) and Laddakh) have never been part of Kashmir as such. These were all independant states who paid taxes and retainers to the British and to the Dogras. The moment the Dogra Mahraja went against his words and signed the assession treaty with Nehru (Post Jinnah's death), states of Chitral and Baltistan announced their assession to Pakistan (despite the fact that they had no legal rights under the partition plan of 1947)and lead their private armies along with the local populace and the Tribal pathans to liberate Muslim lands from India,. The ordinary Kasmiri people (excluding a few exceptions) did not participate in this struggle, especially from the 'VALLEY', many in those times considered this to be an invasion from the Tribals/Pathans and seemed fit not to side with them if not against them.
These people are not Kashmiri ethnically, nor is their language. Nor do the people in this area 'wish to be part of an Independant Kashmir'
If and When we talk about Independant Kashmir, this would mean 'Azad Kashmir' and the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir. Let there be no doubt about it.
"Allah does not change the state of people unless they change what is within themselves" Quran 1311
<br />SALAM
ABOUT THE KASHMIR DISPUTE i have to say something
1) The Kashmir included all the part of Azad Kashmir, Narthren Areas, Jammu, LAddakh and Kashmir should be a independent state
2) If i have a chance to resolve it i will give freedom to all Kashmiries to make their independent country
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Not commenting on the Kashmir option as yet, but I'd like to clear the fact that Northern Areas (Including Chitral, Gilgat & Skardu (Baltistan) and Laddakh) have never been part of Kashmir as such. These were all independant states who paid taxes and retainers to the British and to the Dogras. The moment the Dogra Mahraja went against his words and signed the assession treaty with Nehru (Post Jinnah's death), states of Chitral and Baltistan announced their assession to Pakistan (despite the fact that they had no legal rights under the partition plan of 1947)and lead their private armies along with the local populace and the Tribal pathans to liberate Muslim lands from India,. The ordinary Kasmiri people (excluding a few exceptions) did not participate in this struggle, especially from the 'VALLEY', many in those times considered this to be an invasion from the Tribals/Pathans and seemed fit not to side with them if not against them.
These people are not Kashmiri ethnically, nor is their language. Nor do the people in this area 'wish to be part of an Independant Kashmir'
If and When we talk about Independant Kashmir, this would mean 'Azad Kashmir' and the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir. Let there be no doubt about it.
"Allah does not change the state of people unless they change what is within themselves" Quran 1311
