05-14-2005, 11:36 PM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by khurram_jamal</i>
<br />[green]HELLO PRACS
YOU ARE TOTALLY WRONG YOU MEAN THAT I USE FORUM ONLY FOR POSTING UNUSELESS THINGS. ITâS REALLY YOUR OWN COMMENTS NA????? OK NO PROBLEM<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Am well, that is what it seemed,, well,. its not all that important. Just making my point there, you may choose to not agree or likewise, all right with me. As long as you know what I have to say !
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">BUT ON THE KASHMIR AFFAIR I REALLY DO NOT ACCEPT ANY THING WHICH IS WRONGLY MADE A PART OF HISTORY. YOU ARE TELLING ME THE HISTORY BEFORE 30 YEARS BUT I AM TALKING ABOUT THE OLD HISTORY BEFORE 1947 AND AFTER 1947<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
You fail to understand, it is not history that we are discussing here, these things have happened in the near past, so we have more than history books to tell us whau happened ! We can not agree how good a King Akbar was or if Asoka was as able a King as they say he was. But about Kashmir, we have every thing on the table, now don't we ?
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">BUT YOU CAN SAY ONLY THIS THAT THE PEOPLE OF AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR, NORTHREN AREAS HAD GET FREEDOM AFTER A HOT WAR AGAINST INDIAN TO LIVE WITH AND BE PART OF PAKISTAN. SO THEY WANT TO BE PART OF PAKISTAN IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT ITS IS THE INITIALLY PAKISTAN COME INTO EXIST WITH THE OTHER PARTS OF PAKISTAN. SO YOU MAY UNDERSTAND THAT THESE ARE WHOLLY A KASHMIR WHICH MIGHT TO BE GREAT PROVINCE OF PAKISTAN.
PLEASE DONâT TRY TO STUDY FROM THE NON-HISTORIAN PEOPLE WHO HAVE NO FACT AND NOTHING. THEY ONLY DO THE WORK BY CUT COPY AND PASTE.
*<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
I didn't completely understand what you meant up there ? care to explain. If you meant that a whole united Kashmir would like to part of Pakistan as a bigger and better province, I agree with you all the way. Only that I think that Gilgit-Baltistan should be designated as the fifth province prehand with proportional representation in the National Assembly and the Senate. They are a different people and should like wise be a different province. I also believe that other provinces in Pakistan should also be broken down into various provinces for better administration and better representation (for the various ethinc people).
"Allah does not change the state of people unless they change what is within themselves" Quran 1311
<br />[green]HELLO PRACS
YOU ARE TOTALLY WRONG YOU MEAN THAT I USE FORUM ONLY FOR POSTING UNUSELESS THINGS. ITâS REALLY YOUR OWN COMMENTS NA????? OK NO PROBLEM<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Am well, that is what it seemed,, well,. its not all that important. Just making my point there, you may choose to not agree or likewise, all right with me. As long as you know what I have to say !
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">BUT ON THE KASHMIR AFFAIR I REALLY DO NOT ACCEPT ANY THING WHICH IS WRONGLY MADE A PART OF HISTORY. YOU ARE TELLING ME THE HISTORY BEFORE 30 YEARS BUT I AM TALKING ABOUT THE OLD HISTORY BEFORE 1947 AND AFTER 1947<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
You fail to understand, it is not history that we are discussing here, these things have happened in the near past, so we have more than history books to tell us whau happened ! We can not agree how good a King Akbar was or if Asoka was as able a King as they say he was. But about Kashmir, we have every thing on the table, now don't we ?
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">BUT YOU CAN SAY ONLY THIS THAT THE PEOPLE OF AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR, NORTHREN AREAS HAD GET FREEDOM AFTER A HOT WAR AGAINST INDIAN TO LIVE WITH AND BE PART OF PAKISTAN. SO THEY WANT TO BE PART OF PAKISTAN IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT ITS IS THE INITIALLY PAKISTAN COME INTO EXIST WITH THE OTHER PARTS OF PAKISTAN. SO YOU MAY UNDERSTAND THAT THESE ARE WHOLLY A KASHMIR WHICH MIGHT TO BE GREAT PROVINCE OF PAKISTAN.
PLEASE DONâT TRY TO STUDY FROM THE NON-HISTORIAN PEOPLE WHO HAVE NO FACT AND NOTHING. THEY ONLY DO THE WORK BY CUT COPY AND PASTE.
*<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
I didn't completely understand what you meant up there ? care to explain. If you meant that a whole united Kashmir would like to part of Pakistan as a bigger and better province, I agree with you all the way. Only that I think that Gilgit-Baltistan should be designated as the fifth province prehand with proportional representation in the National Assembly and the Senate. They are a different people and should like wise be a different province. I also believe that other provinces in Pakistan should also be broken down into various provinces for better administration and better representation (for the various ethinc people).
"Allah does not change the state of people unless they change what is within themselves" Quran 1311