10-08-2006, 12:52 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by prashant</i>
<br />what i belive that this was a ploy of british to divide and rule india.if india pakistan and bangladesh would have combined then it would have become economic powerhouse.britain,china,usa,russia,etc in developed world would have had trouble to deal with india.
in india muslims have equal oppurtunities to excell .look at Bollywood industry it is ruled by khans and indian president is muslim.But there are some clashes which happens between hindus and muslims which political parties try to use it in their own end.but these small internal clashes happen in every country which local press makes a big issue about it.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Parshant, first and fore most welcome to the forum. I think you do need to understand what the Pakistan ideology is, who are the people in Pakistan and what there history has been before you can even comment on this subject. Would be a good idea if you would read this thread thoroughly to start with.
Your mention of Bollywood and the President is quite Myopic and I will at this point in time not comment on that, Schuaeb has made quite point. Just a counter argument here.. just because the US ha had no Woman President and because India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh have all had women premiers .. deos it justify to say the Women in South Asia are more empowered ? get my drift there.
Your assumption that the partition was a fallacy and a 'divide and rule' tactic by the British has whatsoever no merit at all. We are talking about different countries here. Although I agree that the British could have done a better job by doing it right and not handing 'Kashmir' to India on a plate for that matter. The Radcliife commission and the way the boundry was changed over night is now an 'open secret'.
<br />what i belive that this was a ploy of british to divide and rule india.if india pakistan and bangladesh would have combined then it would have become economic powerhouse.britain,china,usa,russia,etc in developed world would have had trouble to deal with india.
in india muslims have equal oppurtunities to excell .look at Bollywood industry it is ruled by khans and indian president is muslim.But there are some clashes which happens between hindus and muslims which political parties try to use it in their own end.but these small internal clashes happen in every country which local press makes a big issue about it.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Parshant, first and fore most welcome to the forum. I think you do need to understand what the Pakistan ideology is, who are the people in Pakistan and what there history has been before you can even comment on this subject. Would be a good idea if you would read this thread thoroughly to start with.
Your mention of Bollywood and the President is quite Myopic and I will at this point in time not comment on that, Schuaeb has made quite point. Just a counter argument here.. just because the US ha had no Woman President and because India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh have all had women premiers .. deos it justify to say the Women in South Asia are more empowered ? get my drift there.
Your assumption that the partition was a fallacy and a 'divide and rule' tactic by the British has whatsoever no merit at all. We are talking about different countries here. Although I agree that the British could have done a better job by doing it right and not handing 'Kashmir' to India on a plate for that matter. The Radcliife commission and the way the boundry was changed over night is now an 'open secret'.
