11-18-2006, 11:19 PM
Once again I would insist that Pracs should read the mail properly. If it is difficult, let me explain
1) Some scholars are of the view that so called Islamic Banking is correct and some are not in favor. So when scholars are not of consensus...........
2) Granting of license from SBP does not mean authenticity of compliance of Sharia. Afterall SBP is working underguidelines of IMF and World Bank.
3) The question remains that is there any example of "Islamic Banking" from Quran or Hadith? Is there any guideline avaiable from Holy Book and other revealed script.
4) Unfortunately people preassume improper interpretations and reflect them through words like "If you mean this" or "If you mean that" etc because of poor knowledge. This also indicates the confusion among themselves that what they are saying is correct or incorrect.
So i would like to conclude by inviting a genuine reponse with reference as I mentioned in my original mail because repeating same things constantly without any support in not convincing.
Thank you.
1) Some scholars are of the view that so called Islamic Banking is correct and some are not in favor. So when scholars are not of consensus...........
2) Granting of license from SBP does not mean authenticity of compliance of Sharia. Afterall SBP is working underguidelines of IMF and World Bank.
3) The question remains that is there any example of "Islamic Banking" from Quran or Hadith? Is there any guideline avaiable from Holy Book and other revealed script.
4) Unfortunately people preassume improper interpretations and reflect them through words like "If you mean this" or "If you mean that" etc because of poor knowledge. This also indicates the confusion among themselves that what they are saying is correct or incorrect.
So i would like to conclude by inviting a genuine reponse with reference as I mentioned in my original mail because repeating same things constantly without any support in not convincing.
Thank you.