06-07-2007, 11:14 PM
Dear Amir,
You said in ur previous post that you initially felt me a person of knowledge and afterwards you have changed ur opinion. This shows lack of ur experience and knowledge. You wrongly assess the people. You assessments are not mature ones which have to be changed again and again. You should have a firm assessment which need not to be altered.
You know, I since the onset never believed you to be a person of sound belief and followable knowledge. That's why u always find replies from me on all issues. This is difference between me and you. I dont regret for what I percieved about you. Yes, I like ur interest in religion and I appreciated it but u always appeared to me as a guy who has studied the religion with closed heart.
Anyways, this is ur issue and not mine. I just mentioned it in reply of ur imbalanced cheap post hiting me personally.
The persons you mentioned have never been an active part of Pakistan Tehreek. They mostly migrated to Pakistan and they might have been agreeing to what QAUID was of the view but they were never been that active as the other guys were in TEHREEK-E-PAKISTAN. You have to prove their participation. There might be restricted one but there was no active participation. Further, among the names u mentioned there are very noble men of ALLAH who as per my knowledge were true ULEMA so I dont much talk about them.
Now coming to the point of Mr. FAZAl-ur-Rehman. When I posted that message I was of sure that you will raise this stupid question. I hereunder quote a part of my previous message
..............I dont know what Maulvies have ideas about the role of females in an Islamic society. But I know one thing. When Pakistan was founded, no apparently known Maulvi was with Quaid-e-Azam. The Maulvies like Mr. Fazal-ur-Rehman, his father (Mr. Mufti Mahmood) and like Mr. Abu-al-Kalam Azad (and many more) have used indicent language about Mr. Jinnah. I understand that such language is commonly used in politics...................
If you give a look to these sentences and if your mind and eyes still work and if ur heart is not stumped and if u dont just raise issues with IBLEES originated thoughts, YOU WILL SEE
that I never mentioned that Mr. Fazal-ur-Rehman (or his father) was a part of those who were against Mr. Jinnah at the time of establishment of Pakistan. RATHER, I said that they have used indecent language for Mr. Jinnah. Yes, Mr. AZAD was present at the time of PAKISTAN TEHREEK. However, I dont know about Mr. MUFTI. But here the matter was of using indecent language.
I have once read in daily NAWA-I-WAQAT some years back an interview where Mr. FAZAL-ur-Rehman said the QUAID-E-AZAM was infact a FRUAD-E-AZAM. I dont have that newspaper in my record. But if you want to get its clarity then come to Lahore, visit NAWA-i-WAQAT's office and search for that newspaper in their record.
So, dear Amir, use your eyes properly while seeing others' posts and dont get offensive just becuase of your prejudice thinking.
Best regards,
You said in ur previous post that you initially felt me a person of knowledge and afterwards you have changed ur opinion. This shows lack of ur experience and knowledge. You wrongly assess the people. You assessments are not mature ones which have to be changed again and again. You should have a firm assessment which need not to be altered.
You know, I since the onset never believed you to be a person of sound belief and followable knowledge. That's why u always find replies from me on all issues. This is difference between me and you. I dont regret for what I percieved about you. Yes, I like ur interest in religion and I appreciated it but u always appeared to me as a guy who has studied the religion with closed heart.
Anyways, this is ur issue and not mine. I just mentioned it in reply of ur imbalanced cheap post hiting me personally.
The persons you mentioned have never been an active part of Pakistan Tehreek. They mostly migrated to Pakistan and they might have been agreeing to what QAUID was of the view but they were never been that active as the other guys were in TEHREEK-E-PAKISTAN. You have to prove their participation. There might be restricted one but there was no active participation. Further, among the names u mentioned there are very noble men of ALLAH who as per my knowledge were true ULEMA so I dont much talk about them.
Now coming to the point of Mr. FAZAl-ur-Rehman. When I posted that message I was of sure that you will raise this stupid question. I hereunder quote a part of my previous message
..............I dont know what Maulvies have ideas about the role of females in an Islamic society. But I know one thing. When Pakistan was founded, no apparently known Maulvi was with Quaid-e-Azam. The Maulvies like Mr. Fazal-ur-Rehman, his father (Mr. Mufti Mahmood) and like Mr. Abu-al-Kalam Azad (and many more) have used indicent language about Mr. Jinnah. I understand that such language is commonly used in politics...................
If you give a look to these sentences and if your mind and eyes still work and if ur heart is not stumped and if u dont just raise issues with IBLEES originated thoughts, YOU WILL SEE
that I never mentioned that Mr. Fazal-ur-Rehman (or his father) was a part of those who were against Mr. Jinnah at the time of establishment of Pakistan. RATHER, I said that they have used indecent language for Mr. Jinnah. Yes, Mr. AZAD was present at the time of PAKISTAN TEHREEK. However, I dont know about Mr. MUFTI. But here the matter was of using indecent language.
I have once read in daily NAWA-I-WAQAT some years back an interview where Mr. FAZAL-ur-Rehman said the QUAID-E-AZAM was infact a FRUAD-E-AZAM. I dont have that newspaper in my record. But if you want to get its clarity then come to Lahore, visit NAWA-i-WAQAT's office and search for that newspaper in their record.
So, dear Amir, use your eyes properly while seeing others' posts and dont get offensive just becuase of your prejudice thinking.
Best regards,
