06-22-2007, 05:44 PM
Dear Amir,
I consulted Black's Law Dictionery while replying to Zikria Yameen but I did not quote anything from this dictionery. The things which I clarified also conform to UK laws and as such I dont find any material variance in the clarification given by me. You have also agreed to this effect in ur above reply.
Therefore, I cannot simply understand how could you quote that thread in ur previous post on this thread as an example where something was asked about UK law and was explained in the context of Pakistani Law. I can only struck my head against the hard surface of the table on this baseless quotation by you. Does not it look a matter of enjoyment for others on ur confused assessments of various issues.
Further, how did you conclude that I dont know anything about UK laws? I may or may not be knowing such laws but how could you conclude? Did you find any DOCTOR QUACK sort of reply from me to some query raised by any respectable member?
I can again struck the head only )
Furthermore, this is not the matter of being GHULAM of any one. I dont find myself their GHULAM. FARANGGIES invaded our sub-continent just as we (muslims) invaded INDIA i.e. by BABAR, GHAORI, ABDALI and GHAZNAVI and so many others from time to time. This is the lust of DUNIYA and had nothing to do with ISLAM and ALLAH and DIN etc, I already explained on some other thread. Similar lust is also embedded in Faranggies being humans like us. If other nations had never remained our ghulam, then no body from us remained the ghulam of FARANGGIES, as well.
Moreover, if the status of Ghulam is a reason of similarity of laws, then all the laws should be similar, which is not the case.
However, I agree that FARANGGIES were very much civilized nation in so many areas of life (much more than us) and they did all the progress decades (and in some cases centuries) before we even thought about those things. Therefore, their laws are still considered to be workable here in sub-continent. I personally feel their promulgated laws to be the best as compared to the efforts so far made by our governments who are really the GHULAM of every powerful nation.
Best regards,
Kamran.
I consulted Black's Law Dictionery while replying to Zikria Yameen but I did not quote anything from this dictionery. The things which I clarified also conform to UK laws and as such I dont find any material variance in the clarification given by me. You have also agreed to this effect in ur above reply.
Therefore, I cannot simply understand how could you quote that thread in ur previous post on this thread as an example where something was asked about UK law and was explained in the context of Pakistani Law. I can only struck my head against the hard surface of the table on this baseless quotation by you. Does not it look a matter of enjoyment for others on ur confused assessments of various issues.
Further, how did you conclude that I dont know anything about UK laws? I may or may not be knowing such laws but how could you conclude? Did you find any DOCTOR QUACK sort of reply from me to some query raised by any respectable member?
I can again struck the head only )
Furthermore, this is not the matter of being GHULAM of any one. I dont find myself their GHULAM. FARANGGIES invaded our sub-continent just as we (muslims) invaded INDIA i.e. by BABAR, GHAORI, ABDALI and GHAZNAVI and so many others from time to time. This is the lust of DUNIYA and had nothing to do with ISLAM and ALLAH and DIN etc, I already explained on some other thread. Similar lust is also embedded in Faranggies being humans like us. If other nations had never remained our ghulam, then no body from us remained the ghulam of FARANGGIES, as well.
Moreover, if the status of Ghulam is a reason of similarity of laws, then all the laws should be similar, which is not the case.
However, I agree that FARANGGIES were very much civilized nation in so many areas of life (much more than us) and they did all the progress decades (and in some cases centuries) before we even thought about those things. Therefore, their laws are still considered to be workable here in sub-continent. I personally feel their promulgated laws to be the best as compared to the efforts so far made by our governments who are really the GHULAM of every powerful nation.
Best regards,
Kamran.