07-11-2007, 11:50 PM
Thanks niceguy, at least a found some one who supports my point.
Imran one does not join a firm willfully, one wants to become a chartered accountant and he is exploited in this process. And don't know what 4,000 chartered accountants got to do with lowly stipend rates.
Derivativetrader, agreed its the firms at the first place who are to be blamed, ICAP has not given any limit for maximum stipend and the firms may pay more stipend. However, when it is apparatnt that firms are exploiting the students, shouldn't ICAP intervene? And whats the logic in using the word stipend? Do you think that a period of 5 years is justified as stipend?
Sir, things are quite apparent, such policies only mean to provide chartered accountants cheap work force.
Imran one does not join a firm willfully, one wants to become a chartered accountant and he is exploited in this process. And don't know what 4,000 chartered accountants got to do with lowly stipend rates.
Derivativetrader, agreed its the firms at the first place who are to be blamed, ICAP has not given any limit for maximum stipend and the firms may pay more stipend. However, when it is apparatnt that firms are exploiting the students, shouldn't ICAP intervene? And whats the logic in using the word stipend? Do you think that a period of 5 years is justified as stipend?
Sir, things are quite apparent, such policies only mean to provide chartered accountants cheap work force.
