07-31-2008, 07:02 PM
Dear Shahbaz,
The requirement that "Zuban aur hath sey doosra musalman safe rahey" is the basic issue. I just want that the muslims should at least remain safe from the other muslims. This is the main theme of the whole discussion. The opponent idea is to crush every one without differentiating and without considering limitations, restrictions and problems.
However, the effort to abstain the prevalence of non-sense is not aimed at to harm any other muslim. This is to answer the non-sense. It is a discussion and I typically don't tend to involve the others personally or hit some one's personality. There could be some minor departures of this principle of mine due to the reasons beyond the control and such reasons are visible to every one bearing brain and mind.
Pracs nowhere fueled the topic. Like myself, he also has difference of concepts with Amir and such difference has to go on. This difference has not arisen so shortly in the history as some guys depict in their exclamations. This could be seen for the centuries. Extremism and moderate-ism prevails from centuries. Moderate-ism is not to be messed up with US or Musharraf's acts because they have been using this word for their own agendas and benefits. Moderate-ism was the basic message of Islam. We have been told to adopt the mid-ways. Just go to the meanings of MODERATE. These are âreasonableââ, âmodestâ, âjudiciousâ, âsensibleâ, âtemperateâ etc. This is what humanity ideally wishes and this is the basic message of Islam. This is not an abuse.
So the difference of extremism and moderate-ism will go on and you can see that ones who prefer moderate-ism would appear more logical, mature, disciplined, affectionate, amiable and understandable.
I once again say that this should not be messed up with the moderate-ism being stressed by US or Musharraf. Instead, this means the moderate-ism which is desired by Islam.
Further, I don't find anything wrong or beyond the reality, in the last line of the post of Pracs. Do you?
Regards,
KAMRAN.
