02-12-2009, 05:52 PM
Amir,
I can't go into a lengthy debate since we can only see clues and have no documentary proof. Pracs has pointed out something for you about the actuary Hamayun Akhter.
I can however clear my point which was about how a general can send his sons to USA for such education keeping in view his slary level. Further, this money and assets with such actuaries are inherited from the father. This has nothing to do with professional qualification.
I wonder why people join army and why it is called a professional institute if they want and get huge bonuses for each and every positive (or negative) act. If Akhtar AbdulRehman did something good it was part of his duty (in professional terms) and no bonus (in Govt employment scales) can lead to set up sugar mills and industries.
If we talk in faith's terms (while these people say they are faithful),we can see religious examples. We know Umer Bin Khattab Raziallah Ta'ala was Khalifa-tul-muslimeen and he was objected for supposedly having even one more cloth sheet than the others from maal-e-ghaneemat. He (R.Z.) did not deny answering such a query of a Baddu and proved his faithfullness by letting the people know that the extra cloth sheet was gifted to him by his son. He (R.Z.) did not hide the head and kept even that cloth sheet un-explained. Rather, he (R.Z.) appreciated the query and said to the Baddu that until the times Ummah will have corgeous people like you, it will not go to the wrong track.
Now, is there any General in the history of the world who could Naoozbillah be compared with Umar Bin Khattab (R.Z)? Did he (R.Z.) ever wanted such huge bonuses to set up sugar mills Naoozbillah or acquire the properties.
What we are talking about Amir. Is there any rationale?
Regards,
KAMRAN.
