03-28-2009, 06:48 PM
Dears,
If some body, even after getting required clarification, carries doubt, then what it should be called? "Undigested" does not refer here to stomach's disability, I guess.
Lame allegations just to distort the facts and disgracing some one at personal level shows the level of ethics that are being preached. The only way is to confirm directly from Dr. Kurt's organization, the only one which should be affected for copying Dr. Kurt's material. Although doing so would be another un-ethical effort, but I guess avoidance of doing so is not on account of such worries.
The words "pain", "undigested", "ethically sound", "wise", as well as "idiotic" got some linkage with specific actions and words. If there is a need to clarify, I am ready to post a long message. At the moment I am avoiding it so that it may not make it offensive.
The person who, merely on the basis of difference of opinion, however severe it is, says that he will never be going to respond the other, should be reminded about his words. However, if there is some memory loss I can refer to the said thread "Canadian Immigration and ACCA, CIMA, CFA or CMA", post dated September 20, 2008, timing 074154 P.M.
The one who writes in his post that a single post cannot be treated and deemed all inclusive, appears illogical to state at other place, that why an article was pasted and no personal views were included in the similar post. He should have waited and then commented instead of maligning the whole thread that has been done here.
CFANerd,
There is no question to ask for permission. It is already in place. Simply some fellows cannot get hold this idea. I don't say it is beyond the level of understanding. However, it reflects which, if mentioned, would be taken offensive.
Regards,
KAMRAN.
