03-30-2009, 02:56 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by kamranACA</i>
<br />Dears,
Khalid I don't mind you since people know at large what disorder you carry. You have full right to make this disorder 'rebound' like other ethically sound fellows.
The post quoting Dr Kurt's article did not create any issue for the fellows since noone of them is legal heir of Dr Kurt. The ethics being followed are quite visible. They have been asked to consult Dr kurt's organization which they don't do. This explains the rebounding techniques.
The ones who talk about rebounding should remain quite attentive now onwards. I just confirm that nothing such effort will stop me doing the positive work and every wrong idea floated here will always be replied by me. Whatever it takes and however it rebounds.
Let's see how things proceed.
Regards,
Kamran.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Dears Readers
It is an openly written threat, exposing in advance about the nature of future posts, openly written statement of acceptance of malicious intent of the writer toward me. Off-course I would refer this threat and malicious intent in all of those future posts. It proves that whenever this person would write against my posts, it would be based on this open threat and malicious intent, and not based on unbiased and genuine stand. Now, he has openly accepted that he would write just to oppose for the sake of opposition and he would fall down to the level just to commit personal disgrace. Therefore, any such posts would not have any value because those would be written in opposition of me based on this threat and malicious intent toward me, and not based on views.
By giving this threat, he has already tainted, distorted, and accepted his future biased views against any and each of my posts and views. So, such tainted and biased future views and reasons would carry no worth and value against my reasons.
In one of the previous posts, he accepted remembering words and carrying malign impression and intent toward me since very first discussion, and now he has openly given me a threat and accepted malicious intent of his future posts towards me.
I simply want to remind him that he is not the only person in the world who knows how to write English. It is simply nature of the replying posters that sometimes they do not fall down to that level which this poster holds by writing such low category words. If he would use such words in future posts against me, he would simply prove to be at that level.[)]
Regards
<br />Dears,
Khalid I don't mind you since people know at large what disorder you carry. You have full right to make this disorder 'rebound' like other ethically sound fellows.
The post quoting Dr Kurt's article did not create any issue for the fellows since noone of them is legal heir of Dr Kurt. The ethics being followed are quite visible. They have been asked to consult Dr kurt's organization which they don't do. This explains the rebounding techniques.
The ones who talk about rebounding should remain quite attentive now onwards. I just confirm that nothing such effort will stop me doing the positive work and every wrong idea floated here will always be replied by me. Whatever it takes and however it rebounds.
Let's see how things proceed.
Regards,
Kamran.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Dears Readers
It is an openly written threat, exposing in advance about the nature of future posts, openly written statement of acceptance of malicious intent of the writer toward me. Off-course I would refer this threat and malicious intent in all of those future posts. It proves that whenever this person would write against my posts, it would be based on this open threat and malicious intent, and not based on unbiased and genuine stand. Now, he has openly accepted that he would write just to oppose for the sake of opposition and he would fall down to the level just to commit personal disgrace. Therefore, any such posts would not have any value because those would be written in opposition of me based on this threat and malicious intent toward me, and not based on views.
By giving this threat, he has already tainted, distorted, and accepted his future biased views against any and each of my posts and views. So, such tainted and biased future views and reasons would carry no worth and value against my reasons.
In one of the previous posts, he accepted remembering words and carrying malign impression and intent toward me since very first discussion, and now he has openly given me a threat and accepted malicious intent of his future posts towards me.
I simply want to remind him that he is not the only person in the world who knows how to write English. It is simply nature of the replying posters that sometimes they do not fall down to that level which this poster holds by writing such low category words. If he would use such words in future posts against me, he would simply prove to be at that level.[)]
Regards
