03-31-2009, 02:00 AM
Dears
We all must have seen people around us who share sick jokes and keep repeating low category words against others. So, no wonder if one sardar is doing the same here on this thread and all other threads of this forum wherever someone refuses to accepts his views.
Act of whistle-blowing itself is enough to prove oneâs social responsibility. I know it is little difficult to âdigestâ to an unparallel sardar. I donât wanna intensify his âdigestionâ problem by giving more logical reasoning and arguments about âsocial responsibilities and contacting to law enforcersâ. Already it has caused much âpainâ and âhue and cryâ to him. Already he is in âmashla mar gayaâ and âhor choopoâ âstate of mindâ of which his posts are quite reflective. [)][)]
It is really interesting to see this âdual policyâ of sardar to use low category words and share sick jokes and at the same time mentioning âruining objective of threadâ. Readers can easily identify this âdual policyâ âstrategyâ of sardar. Perhaps this sardar believes other readers are sardars too like him. Oh yes, very first line of his last post is reflection of such thinking.
Similarly, only a sardar can say that a post de-facto permission is enough, and rather than accepting mistake of copy/pasting before getting permission, keep writing low category words and jokes, and saying it a "purposeless debate". What a sardar approach...[)] I would simply say, sardar jee kutch tay socho likhnay ton pahlay, readers are not sardars... [)]
By the way, line and depth of questions raised by this writer are all very âfunnyâ examples, such as first saying âwhy it is causing pain to un-effected partiesâ, then âasking to check permission, and later by himself saying it un-ethicalâ, then saying âonly legal heirs should have such painâ, and now mixing-up act of whistle-blowing with âsocial responsibilities and asking to contact with law enforcersâ. Only sardarâs level of âmentalityâ professional can raise such weak questions. But again, readers are not sardars, even though he thinks.[)]
Regards
We all must have seen people around us who share sick jokes and keep repeating low category words against others. So, no wonder if one sardar is doing the same here on this thread and all other threads of this forum wherever someone refuses to accepts his views.
Act of whistle-blowing itself is enough to prove oneâs social responsibility. I know it is little difficult to âdigestâ to an unparallel sardar. I donât wanna intensify his âdigestionâ problem by giving more logical reasoning and arguments about âsocial responsibilities and contacting to law enforcersâ. Already it has caused much âpainâ and âhue and cryâ to him. Already he is in âmashla mar gayaâ and âhor choopoâ âstate of mindâ of which his posts are quite reflective. [)][)]
It is really interesting to see this âdual policyâ of sardar to use low category words and share sick jokes and at the same time mentioning âruining objective of threadâ. Readers can easily identify this âdual policyâ âstrategyâ of sardar. Perhaps this sardar believes other readers are sardars too like him. Oh yes, very first line of his last post is reflection of such thinking.
Similarly, only a sardar can say that a post de-facto permission is enough, and rather than accepting mistake of copy/pasting before getting permission, keep writing low category words and jokes, and saying it a "purposeless debate". What a sardar approach...[)] I would simply say, sardar jee kutch tay socho likhnay ton pahlay, readers are not sardars... [)]
By the way, line and depth of questions raised by this writer are all very âfunnyâ examples, such as first saying âwhy it is causing pain to un-effected partiesâ, then âasking to check permission, and later by himself saying it un-ethicalâ, then saying âonly legal heirs should have such painâ, and now mixing-up act of whistle-blowing with âsocial responsibilities and asking to contact with law enforcersâ. Only sardarâs level of âmentalityâ professional can raise such weak questions. But again, readers are not sardars, even though he thinks.[)]
Regards
