04-03-2009, 12:50 AM
Dears,
No one endorses the personal defamation. Rabia has already offered her regrets to Admin and after that if we continue our objections on her link quotation, it would be wrong. I have also tried to explain the expected purpose of such quotation she carried in mind.
The person in question his-self is providing reasons to continue the debate. At first he denies that any link did not pertain to him and objects on quoting such links. Then he himself provides further links which make it quite clear that no one went on that specific matrimonial site to play with his fame since his name is appearing at so many other links. I mean such links were given by no body else but him. So there is definitely no problem with his profile.
Further, he said he used fake name on this forum and even he disowned the name appearing on such website. He confirmed he uses fake name and also writes ACCA with that fake name. I mean is there anything to say on this? The people addressing the "ethics" are now khamosh tamashaai. It is exactly what I pointed out about them. He confirms he was ACCA in 2006-2007 (when he mentioned it with his fake name). Let us see if he was a member in that tenure. Rest of comments would come after confirmation.
He again and again confirms he has no link with the geo's website quoted by Rabia. We might have agreed. But at the same time he says
QUOTE
what does it means that necessary changes have been made in profile (craeted using my ID) so that it comes up in google search. What I can say now.
UNQUOTE
At one place he disowns any ID on that website and at other he is alleging that his ID has been stolen to make changes on that website. As far as his name appearing on this website is concerned he says it is fake. I mean where does he stand? Does he call this fake name as his ID? Does he say it is his real name? I mean it sounds like that. Does he agree that he had any ID on geo site? Although I understand what he wants to say, still, we may be seeing some clarification. In fact he should clear what he alleges by saying stealing of ID?
As far as the issue of white or brown girls is concerned he was the man who took the debate to that edge. Does he need reference of his post to jog the memory? I mean if there is some short term loss? Now he is criticizing his own words that are some how repeated by Rabia. Very strange!
I may tell the fellows who want the matter to be resolved that in fact he is fake, frustrated, and dissatisfied person and feels every one is in his own shoes. There is nothing wrong if he corrects his way to deal with the matters. Certainly no body will be arguing with him any more. Our intention has never been to disgrace the others, to whom, we don't even know. The majority of the people are fed up of his attitude and habit of dumping in his frustrations over this forum. The people always referring ethics don't ever find a way to make him realize what he is and what he should correct. We see here so many fellows advising Rabia, solely because of her quotation the whole purpose of which was to explain his fake claims. The info which is available through google is not personal. I may be wrong on it but I did not endorse doing so.
I hope one should think to correct his-self and if such symptoms would be seen, this discussion would automatically stopped.
I don't endorse any recommendation to delete any of the above posts by Admin. I hope it would not be done. If it will be done, I will place all the dissenting views and protest on record within the boundries of decency because such suggestion is only an attempt of running from the facts.
Regards,
KAMRAN.
No one endorses the personal defamation. Rabia has already offered her regrets to Admin and after that if we continue our objections on her link quotation, it would be wrong. I have also tried to explain the expected purpose of such quotation she carried in mind.
The person in question his-self is providing reasons to continue the debate. At first he denies that any link did not pertain to him and objects on quoting such links. Then he himself provides further links which make it quite clear that no one went on that specific matrimonial site to play with his fame since his name is appearing at so many other links. I mean such links were given by no body else but him. So there is definitely no problem with his profile.
Further, he said he used fake name on this forum and even he disowned the name appearing on such website. He confirmed he uses fake name and also writes ACCA with that fake name. I mean is there anything to say on this? The people addressing the "ethics" are now khamosh tamashaai. It is exactly what I pointed out about them. He confirms he was ACCA in 2006-2007 (when he mentioned it with his fake name). Let us see if he was a member in that tenure. Rest of comments would come after confirmation.
He again and again confirms he has no link with the geo's website quoted by Rabia. We might have agreed. But at the same time he says
QUOTE
what does it means that necessary changes have been made in profile (craeted using my ID) so that it comes up in google search. What I can say now.
UNQUOTE
At one place he disowns any ID on that website and at other he is alleging that his ID has been stolen to make changes on that website. As far as his name appearing on this website is concerned he says it is fake. I mean where does he stand? Does he call this fake name as his ID? Does he say it is his real name? I mean it sounds like that. Does he agree that he had any ID on geo site? Although I understand what he wants to say, still, we may be seeing some clarification. In fact he should clear what he alleges by saying stealing of ID?
As far as the issue of white or brown girls is concerned he was the man who took the debate to that edge. Does he need reference of his post to jog the memory? I mean if there is some short term loss? Now he is criticizing his own words that are some how repeated by Rabia. Very strange!
I may tell the fellows who want the matter to be resolved that in fact he is fake, frustrated, and dissatisfied person and feels every one is in his own shoes. There is nothing wrong if he corrects his way to deal with the matters. Certainly no body will be arguing with him any more. Our intention has never been to disgrace the others, to whom, we don't even know. The majority of the people are fed up of his attitude and habit of dumping in his frustrations over this forum. The people always referring ethics don't ever find a way to make him realize what he is and what he should correct. We see here so many fellows advising Rabia, solely because of her quotation the whole purpose of which was to explain his fake claims. The info which is available through google is not personal. I may be wrong on it but I did not endorse doing so.
I hope one should think to correct his-self and if such symptoms would be seen, this discussion would automatically stopped.
I don't endorse any recommendation to delete any of the above posts by Admin. I hope it would not be done. If it will be done, I will place all the dissenting views and protest on record within the boundries of decency because such suggestion is only an attempt of running from the facts.
Regards,
KAMRAN.
