04-03-2009, 01:21 AM
Dears,
I also like to point out one more thing which is very critical. Rest assured it is not any one's defamation. Instead it is to point malign acts of some person over this forum and an attempt to stop defamaing a person who is in fact an ACCA affiliate whose name is being repeated by some one to make his false claims.
Since some body has confirmed that his real name is not what he carries on this forum, it would be quite weird to know that a person having substantially similar name has qualified ACCA recently.
That person's complete name was Khalid Naseem Sipra and his result sheet contained his student number 0250701, he was from Greenwich, United Kingdom.
Since the man we are discussing says he is not Khalid Naseem Sipra (as he confirmed his name on this forum is fake) I don't find it wrong to paste following link which is totally a public information, i.e. the result sheet of ACCA. One can click on it, get the link opened and then by clicking "next" for five times, can go to the result of the man which I am discussing.
http//www.google.com.pk/search?q=khalid+naseem+sipra+ACCA&btnG=Search&hl=en&sa=2
One can also go to check this result through following link. For doing so, one will have to open it, click on the "ACCA affiliates", and then on the input form type 0250701 as student number, "sipra" as surname, "Khalid Naseen" as first name, Greenwich as location, and UK as country. He will get the result.
https//www.acca-business.org/pls/ecommerce/epfpl001.p_startup
I must place on record that this result pertains to December 2008 session so it could not be a person who claims to be a member in 2006 or 2007.
If he is that man, so much of his lies are evident about everything he has so far been claiming. I hope he is not that man.
I mean how ridiculous it is that he is using substantially similar name as his so called fake "nick" or "ID". Had it been his real name (what he mentions here) it would have been no issue since so many names could resemble. But choosing as "nick" or "ID" the name of a person from same profession is quite weird and if this person is not the same whose result I have mentioned above, then it is reportable to original Khalid Nasem Sipra as well as ACCA. It is in fact that man's defamation.
Afterall using fakely someone's name (with greater similarity) and calling ownself as ACCA (member) could leave wrong impression on the real owner of such name and qualification. Here is the things which now requires condemning by all of ethic's advocates. I wonder if they will come up with some legal references.
Now, if some one wants to contact ACCA, all the required info is in place for him.
Let's see what response comes!!!
Regards,
KAMRAN.
I also like to point out one more thing which is very critical. Rest assured it is not any one's defamation. Instead it is to point malign acts of some person over this forum and an attempt to stop defamaing a person who is in fact an ACCA affiliate whose name is being repeated by some one to make his false claims.
Since some body has confirmed that his real name is not what he carries on this forum, it would be quite weird to know that a person having substantially similar name has qualified ACCA recently.
That person's complete name was Khalid Naseem Sipra and his result sheet contained his student number 0250701, he was from Greenwich, United Kingdom.
Since the man we are discussing says he is not Khalid Naseem Sipra (as he confirmed his name on this forum is fake) I don't find it wrong to paste following link which is totally a public information, i.e. the result sheet of ACCA. One can click on it, get the link opened and then by clicking "next" for five times, can go to the result of the man which I am discussing.
http//www.google.com.pk/search?q=khalid+naseem+sipra+ACCA&btnG=Search&hl=en&sa=2
One can also go to check this result through following link. For doing so, one will have to open it, click on the "ACCA affiliates", and then on the input form type 0250701 as student number, "sipra" as surname, "Khalid Naseen" as first name, Greenwich as location, and UK as country. He will get the result.
https//www.acca-business.org/pls/ecommerce/epfpl001.p_startup
I must place on record that this result pertains to December 2008 session so it could not be a person who claims to be a member in 2006 or 2007.
If he is that man, so much of his lies are evident about everything he has so far been claiming. I hope he is not that man.
I mean how ridiculous it is that he is using substantially similar name as his so called fake "nick" or "ID". Had it been his real name (what he mentions here) it would have been no issue since so many names could resemble. But choosing as "nick" or "ID" the name of a person from same profession is quite weird and if this person is not the same whose result I have mentioned above, then it is reportable to original Khalid Nasem Sipra as well as ACCA. It is in fact that man's defamation.
Afterall using fakely someone's name (with greater similarity) and calling ownself as ACCA (member) could leave wrong impression on the real owner of such name and qualification. Here is the things which now requires condemning by all of ethic's advocates. I wonder if they will come up with some legal references.
Now, if some one wants to contact ACCA, all the required info is in place for him.
Let's see what response comes!!!
Regards,
KAMRAN.
