10-20-2009, 09:22 PM
Awais
Personal opinions (either mine or yours) don't have to change the facts since facts could be different than any one's perception.
If you want to objectively discuss that why ACCA is not comparable and why CIMA is comparable and better, I am available to let you know my understanding which would certainly be un-biased.
However, it would expectedly (again) remain un-settled and I feel it will lack objectivity as well.
I would simply reiterate that only open market based evidence can lead to a decision and market conditions are never hidden from any one regardless of whatever debate we do and whatever analysis we produce.
The appointments on grade 17/18 in public sector have to remain out of such count since a quality finance professional (having significant demand and worth in market) does not opt for such a pay scale unless he is intended to do JEHAD or feels no issue in standing on the negative pole for bridging the gap. Most of cases where such jobs are opted for are driven due to lesser market demand in open market conditions. I, however, cannot deny the existence of rare cases that are always expected to exist.
Decision of doing JEHAD is real difficult since it tantamount to a life long quest. However, getting to a negative pole is what we generally witness all around. If myself or any body else is in a state of denial, this makes no difference.
I hope you will not take my words negative.
Regards,
KAMRAN.
Personal opinions (either mine or yours) don't have to change the facts since facts could be different than any one's perception.
If you want to objectively discuss that why ACCA is not comparable and why CIMA is comparable and better, I am available to let you know my understanding which would certainly be un-biased.
However, it would expectedly (again) remain un-settled and I feel it will lack objectivity as well.
I would simply reiterate that only open market based evidence can lead to a decision and market conditions are never hidden from any one regardless of whatever debate we do and whatever analysis we produce.
The appointments on grade 17/18 in public sector have to remain out of such count since a quality finance professional (having significant demand and worth in market) does not opt for such a pay scale unless he is intended to do JEHAD or feels no issue in standing on the negative pole for bridging the gap. Most of cases where such jobs are opted for are driven due to lesser market demand in open market conditions. I, however, cannot deny the existence of rare cases that are always expected to exist.
Decision of doing JEHAD is real difficult since it tantamount to a life long quest. However, getting to a negative pole is what we generally witness all around. If myself or any body else is in a state of denial, this makes no difference.
I hope you will not take my words negative.
Regards,
KAMRAN.
