12-12-2009, 07:37 AM
Amir
111 brigade is heard to have started some movement. However, history suggests that it never took such a long time that has gone since this news was first on-aired. So, I have reasons to believe that there is no "traditional" movement of 111 so far. Regarding "untraditional" movement, nothing can be said.
As far as your idea of military rule is concerned, besides having regard for your concerns, I totally disgaree with all the stuff you wrote in the article you referred above. Do you feel politicians are the only corrupt people in Pakistan? What is your idea about army? Can you go back to the history of this "proud" and "noble" army? Can you characterise and analyse the top leadership of this army?
Army rule is one of the worst jungle rules if it exists any where. There is no doubt in it. Any such rule cannot simply be compared with some of the golden eras in the history for more than a thousand reasons. We must not lose sense for being emotional. Had the army rule been a cure, then this cure should have affected the disease during the over 30 years army rule in Pakistan.
So whatever UNIT you wish or expect is either a day dream or a mis-directed vision caused by emotional idealogy. Give 30 further years to this army and check the results. Nation will be drowned 30 years further deeper in the dirt. We don't forget our heros who had been the reason of change of world's map in 1971. If they are upto it, that was the time to prove. We all know they failed. We can put this responisbility on politicians' shoulders but it will be an attempt to change the topic because army is responsible to fight back all internal and external threats.
It's a long topic and I know I cannot convince prejudiced minds. However, if you aggregate the corruption done by army in last 60 years (in monetary terms) and compare it with similar calculation for politicians, I bet politicians will not even be 20 percent of army in this contest. I can tell you this for obvious and certain reasons.
Regards,
Kamran.
111 brigade is heard to have started some movement. However, history suggests that it never took such a long time that has gone since this news was first on-aired. So, I have reasons to believe that there is no "traditional" movement of 111 so far. Regarding "untraditional" movement, nothing can be said.
As far as your idea of military rule is concerned, besides having regard for your concerns, I totally disgaree with all the stuff you wrote in the article you referred above. Do you feel politicians are the only corrupt people in Pakistan? What is your idea about army? Can you go back to the history of this "proud" and "noble" army? Can you characterise and analyse the top leadership of this army?
Army rule is one of the worst jungle rules if it exists any where. There is no doubt in it. Any such rule cannot simply be compared with some of the golden eras in the history for more than a thousand reasons. We must not lose sense for being emotional. Had the army rule been a cure, then this cure should have affected the disease during the over 30 years army rule in Pakistan.
So whatever UNIT you wish or expect is either a day dream or a mis-directed vision caused by emotional idealogy. Give 30 further years to this army and check the results. Nation will be drowned 30 years further deeper in the dirt. We don't forget our heros who had been the reason of change of world's map in 1971. If they are upto it, that was the time to prove. We all know they failed. We can put this responisbility on politicians' shoulders but it will be an attempt to change the topic because army is responsible to fight back all internal and external threats.
It's a long topic and I know I cannot convince prejudiced minds. However, if you aggregate the corruption done by army in last 60 years (in monetary terms) and compare it with similar calculation for politicians, I bet politicians will not even be 20 percent of army in this contest. I can tell you this for obvious and certain reasons.
Regards,
Kamran.
