02-11-2010, 03:37 AM
Tariq
Either the problems do not exist or they exist. If they do not exits, or their level is so insignificant, then there is no issue. If they exist there can be two situations; firstly, they might be well known to the concerned ones, and/or secondly, there might be lot of ignorance for such existance of issues and problems.
In case they are well known then the required cohesive action should not be over-delayed provided the circumstances do not hinder such action because over-delaying proves an element of ignorance. In a situation where things are being explored and there is no over-delay, you would be right in saying that I have not posted anything new.
In case of ignorance, at least the succesful models should be pondered upon. Since, personally I feel there is some ignorance as well, I am of the view that so much should be done that has been ignored or at least over-delayed.
I may be wrong in this very conclusion (and not in the suggestions given) and may be right as well. However, the upcoming developments of ICMAP will prove where it will be leading to. I believe it is a quality institute and must be thinking on how to take a step forward for the betterment of its members specially those in practice and we will be seeing good things in the coming days.
And yes, you don't know for sure whether or not I am an outsider for ICMAP, so there can be doubts on validity of your conclusion as well. Further, my post was generalized in nature and pointed out broad list of a very few steps, which I guess should be taken, so it does not at all require some pure insider to make it out. I have already invited for discussion on its contents that I believe were not based on any biase. If you feel this all is known then you may be right in saying that there is nothing new, but will arise some other questions.
Best of luck to all of you.
Regards,
KAMRAN.
Either the problems do not exist or they exist. If they do not exits, or their level is so insignificant, then there is no issue. If they exist there can be two situations; firstly, they might be well known to the concerned ones, and/or secondly, there might be lot of ignorance for such existance of issues and problems.
In case they are well known then the required cohesive action should not be over-delayed provided the circumstances do not hinder such action because over-delaying proves an element of ignorance. In a situation where things are being explored and there is no over-delay, you would be right in saying that I have not posted anything new.
In case of ignorance, at least the succesful models should be pondered upon. Since, personally I feel there is some ignorance as well, I am of the view that so much should be done that has been ignored or at least over-delayed.
I may be wrong in this very conclusion (and not in the suggestions given) and may be right as well. However, the upcoming developments of ICMAP will prove where it will be leading to. I believe it is a quality institute and must be thinking on how to take a step forward for the betterment of its members specially those in practice and we will be seeing good things in the coming days.
And yes, you don't know for sure whether or not I am an outsider for ICMAP, so there can be doubts on validity of your conclusion as well. Further, my post was generalized in nature and pointed out broad list of a very few steps, which I guess should be taken, so it does not at all require some pure insider to make it out. I have already invited for discussion on its contents that I believe were not based on any biase. If you feel this all is known then you may be right in saying that there is nothing new, but will arise some other questions.
Best of luck to all of you.
Regards,
KAMRAN.
