02-19-2010, 08:24 AM
Dear student
Both strategies can be fruitful and have been seen getting success.
As another example, I remember that in my firm there was a great rush of work causing late sittings and over load of work (when I was in articles). One of our fellows felt that qualifying with overburden would be hard target. He took NOC and got entered in a very small firm and paid more attention to studies.
He qualified as per his plan before us. We all applauded that he was right and we all were wrong.
However, he was struggling for a good job as he was from a small firm. A bit later a few more (including myself) qualified and being from good practice all got well settled immediately. He was still struggling a bit. We changed our opinion and started thinking his decision was incorrect and we did "marvelous" job.
However, after sometime he got two opportunities with little intervals and he changed two jobs. In a very short span he was also at a very good position. At the moment he is working in a highly reputed listed company/group and has represented his office even internationally. This all is done by a man from too small practice (firm).
So over the time we learnt that in the longer run little issues don't count much PROVIDED you have potential, knowledge, ability and you know the art of getting you properly marketed.
This example may not be a reply to your question, yet explains that all the modalities can be successful as well as dangerous for the one preference over the other.
Predictions are only predictions and actual result can materially vary. Still if you are upto it, in the longer run, little issues don't much count.
Notwithstanding above, I would advise you what Shoaib has already advised.
Regards,
Kamran.
Both strategies can be fruitful and have been seen getting success.
As another example, I remember that in my firm there was a great rush of work causing late sittings and over load of work (when I was in articles). One of our fellows felt that qualifying with overburden would be hard target. He took NOC and got entered in a very small firm and paid more attention to studies.
He qualified as per his plan before us. We all applauded that he was right and we all were wrong.
However, he was struggling for a good job as he was from a small firm. A bit later a few more (including myself) qualified and being from good practice all got well settled immediately. He was still struggling a bit. We changed our opinion and started thinking his decision was incorrect and we did "marvelous" job.
However, after sometime he got two opportunities with little intervals and he changed two jobs. In a very short span he was also at a very good position. At the moment he is working in a highly reputed listed company/group and has represented his office even internationally. This all is done by a man from too small practice (firm).
So over the time we learnt that in the longer run little issues don't count much PROVIDED you have potential, knowledge, ability and you know the art of getting you properly marketed.
This example may not be a reply to your question, yet explains that all the modalities can be successful as well as dangerous for the one preference over the other.
Predictions are only predictions and actual result can materially vary. Still if you are upto it, in the longer run, little issues don't much count.
Notwithstanding above, I would advise you what Shoaib has already advised.
Regards,
Kamran.
