03-03-2010, 04:52 PM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by ACCAite</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Greatkhans</i>
<br />Hi Boss,
Thinking changes according to experience, time and circumstances. What Dard is thinking now might change in future because of some reasons, so I would suggest forum members not to use these kind a words which you wrote in bold.
Every country protects its local designations and there is nothing strange if ICAP/ICMAP do so. In many countries you can't even use these designation if your are not a member of local body. It is natural that ICAP/ICMAP will have an upper hand over ACCA.
But at the same time ACCA is also a reputed accounting body which should not be undermined. Let the market decide who has potential. It will make no difference if one or two people disagree on this forum. Accounting is just not all about practicing. There are hundred of other aspect which could be explored and prove worthiness. In real job markets, as I mentioned many times an employer in just not interested in your designation, he demands many many more things that includes but not limited to your communications skills, technical knowledge, computer & IT skills, presentation skills etc.
I would again request that don't make your discussion a matter of prestige. Avoid hurting words.
Regards,
GREAT KHANS
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
@GREATKHANS unbiased and very well put.
@BOSS, watch what you say here buddy. If the moderators are active, they need to do something about it.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Every place has ill-mannered PpL, so it's better to ignore them because no matter what facts and logics you provide them with, they just won't accept it and start talking as seen here due to enmity
My post was for PpL who have senses, are reasonable and see both sides of the picture
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Greatkhans</i>
<br />Hi Boss,
Thinking changes according to experience, time and circumstances. What Dard is thinking now might change in future because of some reasons, so I would suggest forum members not to use these kind a words which you wrote in bold.
Every country protects its local designations and there is nothing strange if ICAP/ICMAP do so. In many countries you can't even use these designation if your are not a member of local body. It is natural that ICAP/ICMAP will have an upper hand over ACCA.
But at the same time ACCA is also a reputed accounting body which should not be undermined. Let the market decide who has potential. It will make no difference if one or two people disagree on this forum. Accounting is just not all about practicing. There are hundred of other aspect which could be explored and prove worthiness. In real job markets, as I mentioned many times an employer in just not interested in your designation, he demands many many more things that includes but not limited to your communications skills, technical knowledge, computer & IT skills, presentation skills etc.
I would again request that don't make your discussion a matter of prestige. Avoid hurting words.
Regards,
GREAT KHANS
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
@GREATKHANS unbiased and very well put.
@BOSS, watch what you say here buddy. If the moderators are active, they need to do something about it.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Every place has ill-mannered PpL, so it's better to ignore them because no matter what facts and logics you provide them with, they just won't accept it and start talking as seen here due to enmity
My post was for PpL who have senses, are reasonable and see both sides of the picture
