04-29-2010, 04:57 PM
Vital
None of my comments are/were intended to pass a "judgment" on the validity of any law.
I guess it is not our authority to do it; regardless of whoever has promulgated it. If some one is aggrieved he can, however, knock the court's door.
By the way, unless any ordinance is declared invalid or void ab initio, in our personal capacity we cannot deny its outright existence; and thatâs what CCP is currently doing.
None of the CCP official, practically is waiting for anything. They are committed with what has been promulgated (since its non promulgation has already been criticized by them) and are advising all applicants to follow it.
I am currently engaged (as part of consortia) in advising an acquisition of majority stake with management control; and same directions have been received by the acquirers from CCP on all written inquiries.
I know you are not proving any one wrong.
Regards,
KAMRAN.
None of my comments are/were intended to pass a "judgment" on the validity of any law.
I guess it is not our authority to do it; regardless of whoever has promulgated it. If some one is aggrieved he can, however, knock the court's door.
By the way, unless any ordinance is declared invalid or void ab initio, in our personal capacity we cannot deny its outright existence; and thatâs what CCP is currently doing.
None of the CCP official, practically is waiting for anything. They are committed with what has been promulgated (since its non promulgation has already been criticized by them) and are advising all applicants to follow it.
I am currently engaged (as part of consortia) in advising an acquisition of majority stake with management control; and same directions have been received by the acquirers from CCP on all written inquiries.
I know you are not proving any one wrong.
Regards,
KAMRAN.
