06-19-2010, 09:51 PM
Survival of the fittest is a universal truth the denial of which will not serve any purpose to any one.
However, here the issue is much complex. Here professional work, contract, mentor/trainee relationship (ustaad/shaagird), mutual understanding and dependence, reliance, reverence and respect every thing has its involvement in one way or other.
I see here one member said that "its right and not a favor". While saying this he might have forgotton that "favor" starts from the day he is intaken in the firm. So many fittest might have been ignored when such a favor is given. When you learn a word from your mentor (senior, manager, partner whoever), the favor starts for which you cannot pay back for the entire life time. And favor starts when you are given an environment which makes you what you are supposed to be. I know when people join firms, they don't even know alphabets. This environment of course has to be as per firm's level and the differences among firms is not an issue since a firm joined by student reflects his own decision.
So if we come on to count favors we will enlist a long detail. Similarly the reverence, understanding, hardwork, obedience, discipline and positive attitude of trainees is what can pay back for the "favors"; otherwise it is impossible.
So, these all motivational and ethical speeches are fine till the time mutual respect remains un-affected. Once this is put behind, then DAURNAY KO MAIDAAN SAB KAY LIYE AIK JAISA HOTA HAI; means survival of the fittest and brutal economic factors will play their role.
You try to apply it even at your very much personalized life back at homes and you will find same conclusions.
People have all the right to dis-agree. We in our daily life see the cases where sons go to courts against their real fathers. So, its not a point of discussion.
As far as motivational benefits and training regulations are concerned, I am of the confirmed view that the requirements should be met in the sense these are desired. There are no two opinions.
I hope you all can understand what I wanted to say besides explaining the truth of survival of the fittest.
Regards,
However, here the issue is much complex. Here professional work, contract, mentor/trainee relationship (ustaad/shaagird), mutual understanding and dependence, reliance, reverence and respect every thing has its involvement in one way or other.
I see here one member said that "its right and not a favor". While saying this he might have forgotton that "favor" starts from the day he is intaken in the firm. So many fittest might have been ignored when such a favor is given. When you learn a word from your mentor (senior, manager, partner whoever), the favor starts for which you cannot pay back for the entire life time. And favor starts when you are given an environment which makes you what you are supposed to be. I know when people join firms, they don't even know alphabets. This environment of course has to be as per firm's level and the differences among firms is not an issue since a firm joined by student reflects his own decision.
So if we come on to count favors we will enlist a long detail. Similarly the reverence, understanding, hardwork, obedience, discipline and positive attitude of trainees is what can pay back for the "favors"; otherwise it is impossible.
So, these all motivational and ethical speeches are fine till the time mutual respect remains un-affected. Once this is put behind, then DAURNAY KO MAIDAAN SAB KAY LIYE AIK JAISA HOTA HAI; means survival of the fittest and brutal economic factors will play their role.
You try to apply it even at your very much personalized life back at homes and you will find same conclusions.
People have all the right to dis-agree. We in our daily life see the cases where sons go to courts against their real fathers. So, its not a point of discussion.
As far as motivational benefits and training regulations are concerned, I am of the confirmed view that the requirements should be met in the sense these are desired. There are no two opinions.
I hope you all can understand what I wanted to say besides explaining the truth of survival of the fittest.
Regards,