06-26-2010, 11:55 PM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by VITAL</i>
<br />Arsenal I donot make this topic to discuss what you called the future of ACCA in this forum. The CA students are never interested in the extent of exemptions granted or will be granted to ACCA students. I am not interested in the ICAP policy regarding this whether past or future. We simply want improvements in our study material and simply want new developments in CA profession to meet the demands of what is happening around the world and will be happened. To achieve this we should follow relevent techniques of ICAEW (copy is not the right word) because ICAEW is the benchmark not only for ICAP but also for ACCA.Yes Kamran Bhai is right we are not behind. our examination policy is ok. problem lies in study material sorts of things.
I am waiting for something new that is beneficial for CA not the new affecting ACCA.
But unfortunately CA students turned mute spectators and I found myself in needless discussion with ACCAs. So plz donât start CA vs ACCA debate. Your ideas regarding the new developments will be welcomed.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
okay i believe that my statements above have given rise to some misconceptions.
my personal view is
1. Pakistani CAs are better than ACCAs
2. Pakistani CAs go through a much difficult and stringent training process and exams which menas that they are very well prepared by the time they qualify
3. any person who becomes a Pak CA deserves every bit credit for proving to be a great and successful individual
4. ACCA is for those people (including me) who are of a lower level and were either unable to pass CA exams or did not have the guts to enter into the CA program.
therefore, it is my request to every forum member that whatever i say or have ever said must be weighed in context to my above statements.
As far as the topic is concerned, i think it is high time ICAP reorganizes its structure and it will be great for Pakistani CAs.
Rgds,
<br />Arsenal I donot make this topic to discuss what you called the future of ACCA in this forum. The CA students are never interested in the extent of exemptions granted or will be granted to ACCA students. I am not interested in the ICAP policy regarding this whether past or future. We simply want improvements in our study material and simply want new developments in CA profession to meet the demands of what is happening around the world and will be happened. To achieve this we should follow relevent techniques of ICAEW (copy is not the right word) because ICAEW is the benchmark not only for ICAP but also for ACCA.Yes Kamran Bhai is right we are not behind. our examination policy is ok. problem lies in study material sorts of things.
I am waiting for something new that is beneficial for CA not the new affecting ACCA.
But unfortunately CA students turned mute spectators and I found myself in needless discussion with ACCAs. So plz donât start CA vs ACCA debate. Your ideas regarding the new developments will be welcomed.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
okay i believe that my statements above have given rise to some misconceptions.
my personal view is
1. Pakistani CAs are better than ACCAs
2. Pakistani CAs go through a much difficult and stringent training process and exams which menas that they are very well prepared by the time they qualify
3. any person who becomes a Pak CA deserves every bit credit for proving to be a great and successful individual
4. ACCA is for those people (including me) who are of a lower level and were either unable to pass CA exams or did not have the guts to enter into the CA program.
therefore, it is my request to every forum member that whatever i say or have ever said must be weighed in context to my above statements.
As far as the topic is concerned, i think it is high time ICAP reorganizes its structure and it will be great for Pakistani CAs.
Rgds,
