06-28-2010, 09:01 PM
Shani
The debate that which curricular and books should be followed is not making a point because purpose is to benefit the students and provide them fullest validly available resources. In IFRS compliant countries there is no major difference in basics, so either you develop or you get it developed, it makes no difference.
I also feel when a prototype comes under question ICAEW is the bestest in its quality. What MOU with India is, we don't care because that entirely is the outcome of number game. Here we cannot solely for this reason prefer India over ICAEW. I beleive you are sensible enough to differentiate what is polictics and what is quality.
I agree with your point about getting the material developed from Kaplan or BPP etc. As far as curriculum's structure is concerned it is not going to be a bigger deviation. Simply students will be benefited by an approach that has been proved internationally.
I tend to avoid personalized discussion and I wish you to avoid it as well.
Regards,
The debate that which curricular and books should be followed is not making a point because purpose is to benefit the students and provide them fullest validly available resources. In IFRS compliant countries there is no major difference in basics, so either you develop or you get it developed, it makes no difference.
I also feel when a prototype comes under question ICAEW is the bestest in its quality. What MOU with India is, we don't care because that entirely is the outcome of number game. Here we cannot solely for this reason prefer India over ICAEW. I beleive you are sensible enough to differentiate what is polictics and what is quality.
I agree with your point about getting the material developed from Kaplan or BPP etc. As far as curriculum's structure is concerned it is not going to be a bigger deviation. Simply students will be benefited by an approach that has been proved internationally.
I tend to avoid personalized discussion and I wish you to avoid it as well.
Regards,
