07-14-2010, 10:12 PM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by fpaimran</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Ajnabi</i>
Dear Ciapk,
Fazail-e-Amal does not require any authenticity, there isn't any dubious Hadees or story in it and none of its contents is based on fiction or of doubtful material. Since the said book has not been issued by our so called muslims i.e. Baralvies, where we see new amendments on monthly or even weekly basis.
Ajnabi.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
100% agreed with Ciapk, and surprised to read the comments of Mr. Ajnabi that these books doest require any authenticity.
What I comprehended from above comments is that Mr. Ajnabi did not have background knowledge of auditing and not aware about importance of audit trail and conclusive and persuasive audit evidence?.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Dears,
This is your prerogative, both of you may second each other on whatever assumptions of your choice, and let it be unreplied, as well, whether i know about audit procedures or evidences etc., this would neither serve your purpose nor mine, so irrelevant is futile to be discussed.
Rest of the material written by ciapk is also irrelevant, atleast, in the current scenario.
Furthermore, your faint and obscure contentions may initiate a futile and nugatory debate for which i would neither be available nor would like to be involved in.
Consider it a differentiation of mindset and let others do what they do, you may not rectify others when you need to be rectified by others.
Regards,
Ajnabi.
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Ajnabi</i>
Dear Ciapk,
Fazail-e-Amal does not require any authenticity, there isn't any dubious Hadees or story in it and none of its contents is based on fiction or of doubtful material. Since the said book has not been issued by our so called muslims i.e. Baralvies, where we see new amendments on monthly or even weekly basis.
Ajnabi.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
100% agreed with Ciapk, and surprised to read the comments of Mr. Ajnabi that these books doest require any authenticity.
What I comprehended from above comments is that Mr. Ajnabi did not have background knowledge of auditing and not aware about importance of audit trail and conclusive and persuasive audit evidence?.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Dears,
This is your prerogative, both of you may second each other on whatever assumptions of your choice, and let it be unreplied, as well, whether i know about audit procedures or evidences etc., this would neither serve your purpose nor mine, so irrelevant is futile to be discussed.
Rest of the material written by ciapk is also irrelevant, atleast, in the current scenario.
Furthermore, your faint and obscure contentions may initiate a futile and nugatory debate for which i would neither be available nor would like to be involved in.
Consider it a differentiation of mindset and let others do what they do, you may not rectify others when you need to be rectified by others.
Regards,
Ajnabi.
