07-16-2010, 04:31 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Dard</i>
<br />I don't see any reason for ICAP to fear ACCA. In Pakistan ICAP is the regularity body
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
you said, as above, you dont see any reason for ICAP to fear ACCA. Right. Now what changed your mind? Have you not seen huge numbers of ACCA students before.
Second, what ICAEW is doing here again? ICAP never made any official statement regarding the taking up of ICAEW system. It is just proposal. We just discussed.
Third, exemptions are not given on the basis of fairness, they are given a matter of policy. I cannot write again and again. PLZ re-read. I accept the reality and say withdrawing of exemptions is not fair.
Mr. Dard, I do respect ACCA students. Its ICAP, man. Its ICAP, understand its working and system. We CA students are not living in paradise. We faced bad failure. Was that fair? It was introduced as a matter of policy and abolished as a matter of policy. I still not get the logic of its abolishment. Whatever ICAP is doing, it is just of because of well-being of profession.
Here a person said that 80% ACCA students take ACCA as shortcut. You did not disagree with him. If those 80% come in CA firms, where we go? and if those 80% become members, what about the scope of CA in its own country. CA firms cannot induct those 80%. I think you people are taking this as threat for the ICAP. It is not a threat. It is problem. These numbers are problem. The huge supply in the market cause the low price of the commodity. ICAP has to keep that supply in check. You said that ACCA has no much scope in Pakistan. Why Beause of that supply.
Pak CA profession cannot absorb huge supply. The economic conditions should also be considerd in the given context.
Otherwise,qualifications donot pose any threat on each other.
I hope you understand now. If not, I dont care.
<br />I don't see any reason for ICAP to fear ACCA. In Pakistan ICAP is the regularity body
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
you said, as above, you dont see any reason for ICAP to fear ACCA. Right. Now what changed your mind? Have you not seen huge numbers of ACCA students before.
Second, what ICAEW is doing here again? ICAP never made any official statement regarding the taking up of ICAEW system. It is just proposal. We just discussed.
Third, exemptions are not given on the basis of fairness, they are given a matter of policy. I cannot write again and again. PLZ re-read. I accept the reality and say withdrawing of exemptions is not fair.
Mr. Dard, I do respect ACCA students. Its ICAP, man. Its ICAP, understand its working and system. We CA students are not living in paradise. We faced bad failure. Was that fair? It was introduced as a matter of policy and abolished as a matter of policy. I still not get the logic of its abolishment. Whatever ICAP is doing, it is just of because of well-being of profession.
Here a person said that 80% ACCA students take ACCA as shortcut. You did not disagree with him. If those 80% come in CA firms, where we go? and if those 80% become members, what about the scope of CA in its own country. CA firms cannot induct those 80%. I think you people are taking this as threat for the ICAP. It is not a threat. It is problem. These numbers are problem. The huge supply in the market cause the low price of the commodity. ICAP has to keep that supply in check. You said that ACCA has no much scope in Pakistan. Why Beause of that supply.
Pak CA profession cannot absorb huge supply. The economic conditions should also be considerd in the given context.
Otherwise,qualifications donot pose any threat on each other.
I hope you understand now. If not, I dont care.
