10-15-2010, 10:07 PM
Kamran, Maaf karna bhai may nay galati say soch liya tha that you must have been awarded good sense of humour.
But your reply reverse my anticipations about you.
If i said that "i dont know about your past interaction with him", it should mean that i didn't know about your interaction before my membership at this forum, i got registered on February, this year.
I didn't mean that, after i got registered, i have not gone through your posts against each other.
Further, at the following thread you have been agreed to Toronto Boy, that you have been agreed with his(Toronto Boy's) suggestions, now one may go through his posts and your post too.
(By saying " i have been agreed to you", should mean that i am agreed to you in all matters, you said; this clarification was necessary, since i dont know how you would treat my this statement as well)
http//www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=8274&whichpage=1
(Personaly, i do not consider it viable to quote the same from there,at least at this thread; as you did against me)
By the way, your faint analysis indicates how many times you went through my post[)]
To your other queries, let me tell you, members should be responded in a way, their replies are appeared to others, irrespective of their sex and age. I did, what i considered feasible and i do have no repents in this regard. you would have done the same, should you was me.
However, i would have surely replied the same even if it were you.
Because i hate those who have no respect for others, so i am quite worst for bad people; at this thread you have shown your bad act against Awais, at "Zaid Hamid" thread, you became worst; although i do have no interaction with Awais, further, he has also said that he does not want to directly involve in any contravention with anyone, which clearly indicates that he didn't care of my posts which is in his support, though upto meager extent, but i do have no complain against him, since he has shown his good act by his mere simple sentence.
Although he could have treated you in the same way,in which you did, and if he does not do then do not assume that he cant, he may certainly. However, you should learn that you should now avoid using the tactic to tackle the people in a way , you do; specially to those who do not involve themselves like you.
But your reply reverse my anticipations about you.
If i said that "i dont know about your past interaction with him", it should mean that i didn't know about your interaction before my membership at this forum, i got registered on February, this year.
I didn't mean that, after i got registered, i have not gone through your posts against each other.
Further, at the following thread you have been agreed to Toronto Boy, that you have been agreed with his(Toronto Boy's) suggestions, now one may go through his posts and your post too.
(By saying " i have been agreed to you", should mean that i am agreed to you in all matters, you said; this clarification was necessary, since i dont know how you would treat my this statement as well)
http//www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=8274&whichpage=1
(Personaly, i do not consider it viable to quote the same from there,at least at this thread; as you did against me)
By the way, your faint analysis indicates how many times you went through my post[)]
To your other queries, let me tell you, members should be responded in a way, their replies are appeared to others, irrespective of their sex and age. I did, what i considered feasible and i do have no repents in this regard. you would have done the same, should you was me.
However, i would have surely replied the same even if it were you.
Because i hate those who have no respect for others, so i am quite worst for bad people; at this thread you have shown your bad act against Awais, at "Zaid Hamid" thread, you became worst; although i do have no interaction with Awais, further, he has also said that he does not want to directly involve in any contravention with anyone, which clearly indicates that he didn't care of my posts which is in his support, though upto meager extent, but i do have no complain against him, since he has shown his good act by his mere simple sentence.
Although he could have treated you in the same way,in which you did, and if he does not do then do not assume that he cant, he may certainly. However, you should learn that you should now avoid using the tactic to tackle the people in a way , you do; specially to those who do not involve themselves like you.
