07-27-2003, 06:08 AM
hi pervaiz, its that thing that keeps you from being wanting to called a 'PAKI' that makes me feel proud of being one. (but u r a paki, I reckon, it does not need your endorsement).
as for quoting the reference, I quoted somewhere else that I'm not good at quoting references (I focus more on the knowledge than its reliable source) and as for the evidence,,,, my word is my evidence <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle>
nah, I didnt mean they were "walked over", I meant they get a 'red carpet' treatment (which is discrimination)
I wont answer your objection on 'bogus' - and its 'ingenuine' not 'disgenuine' (I think <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle> , again I cant quote you any dictionary, besides its no shame being wrong <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
I read the auditing paper too, the first question for 10 or 15 marks, and it wanted comments on the post Anderson collapse and how accountants were affected - its found in no book, unless in scattered form. then there were opinions required, so I cant see how u call it a 'rata' based paper. I've seen it and I think they should focus more on the syllabus.
I've read somewhere 'education is merely transportation from ignorance to miserable uncertainty'
linking to SMraza, I think one reason they dont join the field is cuz they are shy.
and u know it realy pisses me off to hear people talking about the treatment (indecent one) ladies get while on job, while they are referring to the miserable condition our ladies are in. its not the urban ladies that are being exploited, its the rural ladies that are in adverse condition, but nobody speaks for them, cuz they keep in their houses and you(the society) wont gain anything for siding with them. we should show our concern for those ladies rather than giving extra advantages to those having fun in the cities, and all that in the name of ladies being under developed (hell).
u know Guybrush there's another mentality going on,,, to let ladies (in one's house and outside) do whatever they want, so that you can atleast escape from the label of being - what u said??!!! 'warpred pathetic minds', and this has now led us to watch what they show on their dramas in geo and indus etc (and if u project it, u'll know its not long before we become ETC)....... so its right, to consider travelling ladies indecent, but then u cant just overlook what they can fall into - I mean they are definitely vulnerable (and today's guys are pathetic, I see my friends, each one has a girl friend or two, and they never stop on wanting more) so in such a desperate society, its definitely risky.
yeah, lets stop screening the ladies with greed in our eyes, and lets stop the ladies wear revealing apparels - I hope thats okay.
oh no, womenfolks are great and I want to respect them and respect I do, to the extent I can.
there again you are being subjective - say what MMA is doing wrong, and its wrong, but just making MMA a synonym for mischief is a little too harsh.
and none of it is meant to target somebody personally, infect I had fun reading posts against my views, so I hope you enjoy it too.
Me rulz
as for quoting the reference, I quoted somewhere else that I'm not good at quoting references (I focus more on the knowledge than its reliable source) and as for the evidence,,,, my word is my evidence <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle>
nah, I didnt mean they were "walked over", I meant they get a 'red carpet' treatment (which is discrimination)
I wont answer your objection on 'bogus' - and its 'ingenuine' not 'disgenuine' (I think <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle> , again I cant quote you any dictionary, besides its no shame being wrong <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
I read the auditing paper too, the first question for 10 or 15 marks, and it wanted comments on the post Anderson collapse and how accountants were affected - its found in no book, unless in scattered form. then there were opinions required, so I cant see how u call it a 'rata' based paper. I've seen it and I think they should focus more on the syllabus.
I've read somewhere 'education is merely transportation from ignorance to miserable uncertainty'
linking to SMraza, I think one reason they dont join the field is cuz they are shy.
and u know it realy pisses me off to hear people talking about the treatment (indecent one) ladies get while on job, while they are referring to the miserable condition our ladies are in. its not the urban ladies that are being exploited, its the rural ladies that are in adverse condition, but nobody speaks for them, cuz they keep in their houses and you(the society) wont gain anything for siding with them. we should show our concern for those ladies rather than giving extra advantages to those having fun in the cities, and all that in the name of ladies being under developed (hell).
u know Guybrush there's another mentality going on,,, to let ladies (in one's house and outside) do whatever they want, so that you can atleast escape from the label of being - what u said??!!! 'warpred pathetic minds', and this has now led us to watch what they show on their dramas in geo and indus etc (and if u project it, u'll know its not long before we become ETC)....... so its right, to consider travelling ladies indecent, but then u cant just overlook what they can fall into - I mean they are definitely vulnerable (and today's guys are pathetic, I see my friends, each one has a girl friend or two, and they never stop on wanting more) so in such a desperate society, its definitely risky.
yeah, lets stop screening the ladies with greed in our eyes, and lets stop the ladies wear revealing apparels - I hope thats okay.
oh no, womenfolks are great and I want to respect them and respect I do, to the extent I can.
there again you are being subjective - say what MMA is doing wrong, and its wrong, but just making MMA a synonym for mischief is a little too harsh.
and none of it is meant to target somebody personally, infect I had fun reading posts against my views, so I hope you enjoy it too.
Me rulz
