02-06-2011, 06:14 PM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by mini</i>
<br />Yeah I read that topic, but that rarely happens.. even tho these firms dont want to pay for our expenses.. they rarely would issue a side amended non - expenses contract aswell..
And regarding the matter of sticking with them for 3 years.. Correct me if I'm wrong ... but as far as i know <b>they issue contracts for training that last for 3 years.. so sticking with them is more of a legal obligation not an incentive</b>. By 3 years you mean 4 years in total right?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
That's correct. What i meant was that the 3year contract is an incentive for them, not us, and despite that they don't give out much contracts
<br />Yeah I read that topic, but that rarely happens.. even tho these firms dont want to pay for our expenses.. they rarely would issue a side amended non - expenses contract aswell..
And regarding the matter of sticking with them for 3 years.. Correct me if I'm wrong ... but as far as i know <b>they issue contracts for training that last for 3 years.. so sticking with them is more of a legal obligation not an incentive</b>. By 3 years you mean 4 years in total right?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
That's correct. What i meant was that the 3year contract is an incentive for them, not us, and despite that they don't give out much contracts
