07-01-2011, 08:02 PM
Brother,
First of all let me suggest that it would be better if you write your messages in English because Urdu is not based on Roman words and such a written message is not properly understandable. Secondly, being a room-mate of CAs and ACCAs does not bless anyone with an insight to a profession. Thirdly, I donât much endorse your logic of saving Forex by placing bars on foreign qualifications. Another member has given you some understandable reasons (on your other thread) that why your conclusion is incorrect. You need to understand that Forex can be saved using so many other better techniques and tariff barriers. Just put 1000% duty on, say, imported dress cloth or cars (or any other luxury items) and you might be saving 100s time more than what you intend to save from a restriction on ACCA or CIMA etc. Please remember my brother, Forex is always intended to be saved raising barriers against LUXURY ITEMS and not about necessities or investments; and if you can understand education is the biggest investment in the world. How ACCA or CIMA can be proven as investments is a question that you have been answered with by the aforesaid other member on another thread initiated by you.
I agree that other countries, specially UK, are earning money from foreign students; but what goes wrong in it, if we are paying them with our own wilingness? It is a free trade market and everyone has been blessed with eyes and ears to take appropriate decision. If someone feels that bodies like ACCA are making money out of their hard earned wealth, they should think over it many times and adopt alternative routes that are also available. We can give them a proper advice but cannot put caps on anyoneâs wishes, so far these are legally and morally allowed. However, if someone seeks advice, honesty requires that we should let him know what we consider appropriate for ourselves. There is no harm in it. I have always been saying that let everyone do what he deems fit. The decision is of the decision maker and we MUST not influence anyone as to what he needs for his life. Accordingly the fruit of oneâs efforts is also solely for him and he has to take the burden of his decisions ultimately.
You also said something about UK; let me quote it below
â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦..Being Export Manager in Chemical, main janta ho kay UK Industry wise kuch khas nai hay as compare to other european countries. UK Chota sa country hayâ¦â¦â¦â¦..â¦..â¦..
Brother, have you ever compared the annual Budget of this Chota Sa Country with so-called Bigger Countries like Pakistan and Sri Lanka etc. When we concentrate on all the 3 important aspects i.e. economic power, military power and political power, do you know France, UK and Germany are called the Big3 of Europe with such a reference; out of which France leads but with a very short margin against UK and then follows Germany. All other countries in Europe are incomparable to these three on such fronts. Give it a try to understand the facts.
I have considered your suggestions pertaining to allow Matric pass students to enter into CA, and am wondering why ICAP cannot introduce a CA programme from Pre-Nursery Level by designing around 10 or 12 pre-module-A modules? These 10-12 modules can include subjects starting from alphabets, colors, blocks etc to Matric level math, science, Urdu, English etc? Would it work? Anyway, I am kidding BUT the example aimed at to explain that ultimately there is an end and a limit for everything. Personally, I did not even like the decision of allowing direct CA entry route to Higher Secondary (F.Sc, I.Com etc) people and believe this has created some problems of immaturity. However, ICAP and ICMAP must be looking at the moves other bodies have taken and the ultimate decision they have to make. I believe there are people who can decide better collectively than what we individually think and discuss. Yes, we, as members, can give them the appropriate suggestions to start or support a thought provoking process on any professional aspect. If any such move (if came under consideration) would be discussed with the members, I, however tiny voice I have, will oppose such a proposition for the well being of the quality of the upcoming professionals.
Remember my words please, as much would you relax the requirements and ease the process, so much deterioration in the quality of output you will witness over the time.
Please note that my statements do not represent any thought or opinion of any institute at all.
Best regards,
First of all let me suggest that it would be better if you write your messages in English because Urdu is not based on Roman words and such a written message is not properly understandable. Secondly, being a room-mate of CAs and ACCAs does not bless anyone with an insight to a profession. Thirdly, I donât much endorse your logic of saving Forex by placing bars on foreign qualifications. Another member has given you some understandable reasons (on your other thread) that why your conclusion is incorrect. You need to understand that Forex can be saved using so many other better techniques and tariff barriers. Just put 1000% duty on, say, imported dress cloth or cars (or any other luxury items) and you might be saving 100s time more than what you intend to save from a restriction on ACCA or CIMA etc. Please remember my brother, Forex is always intended to be saved raising barriers against LUXURY ITEMS and not about necessities or investments; and if you can understand education is the biggest investment in the world. How ACCA or CIMA can be proven as investments is a question that you have been answered with by the aforesaid other member on another thread initiated by you.
I agree that other countries, specially UK, are earning money from foreign students; but what goes wrong in it, if we are paying them with our own wilingness? It is a free trade market and everyone has been blessed with eyes and ears to take appropriate decision. If someone feels that bodies like ACCA are making money out of their hard earned wealth, they should think over it many times and adopt alternative routes that are also available. We can give them a proper advice but cannot put caps on anyoneâs wishes, so far these are legally and morally allowed. However, if someone seeks advice, honesty requires that we should let him know what we consider appropriate for ourselves. There is no harm in it. I have always been saying that let everyone do what he deems fit. The decision is of the decision maker and we MUST not influence anyone as to what he needs for his life. Accordingly the fruit of oneâs efforts is also solely for him and he has to take the burden of his decisions ultimately.
You also said something about UK; let me quote it below
â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦..Being Export Manager in Chemical, main janta ho kay UK Industry wise kuch khas nai hay as compare to other european countries. UK Chota sa country hayâ¦â¦â¦â¦..â¦..â¦..
Brother, have you ever compared the annual Budget of this Chota Sa Country with so-called Bigger Countries like Pakistan and Sri Lanka etc. When we concentrate on all the 3 important aspects i.e. economic power, military power and political power, do you know France, UK and Germany are called the Big3 of Europe with such a reference; out of which France leads but with a very short margin against UK and then follows Germany. All other countries in Europe are incomparable to these three on such fronts. Give it a try to understand the facts.
I have considered your suggestions pertaining to allow Matric pass students to enter into CA, and am wondering why ICAP cannot introduce a CA programme from Pre-Nursery Level by designing around 10 or 12 pre-module-A modules? These 10-12 modules can include subjects starting from alphabets, colors, blocks etc to Matric level math, science, Urdu, English etc? Would it work? Anyway, I am kidding BUT the example aimed at to explain that ultimately there is an end and a limit for everything. Personally, I did not even like the decision of allowing direct CA entry route to Higher Secondary (F.Sc, I.Com etc) people and believe this has created some problems of immaturity. However, ICAP and ICMAP must be looking at the moves other bodies have taken and the ultimate decision they have to make. I believe there are people who can decide better collectively than what we individually think and discuss. Yes, we, as members, can give them the appropriate suggestions to start or support a thought provoking process on any professional aspect. If any such move (if came under consideration) would be discussed with the members, I, however tiny voice I have, will oppose such a proposition for the well being of the quality of the upcoming professionals.
Remember my words please, as much would you relax the requirements and ease the process, so much deterioration in the quality of output you will witness over the time.
Please note that my statements do not represent any thought or opinion of any institute at all.
Best regards,
