10-11-2007, 02:12 AM
Dear,
You are again beating about the bush.
I did not say HR policies are not required by CA firms. Instead, I said HR policies are numerously focussed on employees. The HR issues of students are quite a few and training regulations issued by ICAP will definitely bring some change over the period on these very few issues like late sittings, credit leaves, proper allocation/rotation.
Further I negated your idea of compulsory participation of students in the managerial affairs of the firm. I strictly dont believe in it becoz students are by no means the stakeholders of the firms in real sense. You may have different opinion.
The sort of leniency that you people expect is never desirable. Like what u commented about some friend of yours advised by u to take leave from his firm and join new firm to have a good experience so as to decide whether or not to leave his earlier firm. Students are normally at very early age specially after the introdution of moduler scheme, therefore, they normally mis-use such leniency. Yes, leniency should be expressed in the issues of their personal development and character building. They should be given exam leaves and credit for extra work they do in some job. This normally is done by all good firms, so it is not something to be explored.
In other issues, I dont agree to be lenient.
This must not hurt you as u r not my student and my personal view cannot harm you.
As far s my quotation of Quranic verse, you said u dont find logical reasoning of it. I may remind you that you oftenly dont find logical reasonings of so many things. Now dont mind for these words plz.
Again I may remind you what was the main issue of this thread.
You promised to quote some OC cases.
I will wait for it.
Regards,
Kamran.
You are again beating about the bush.
I did not say HR policies are not required by CA firms. Instead, I said HR policies are numerously focussed on employees. The HR issues of students are quite a few and training regulations issued by ICAP will definitely bring some change over the period on these very few issues like late sittings, credit leaves, proper allocation/rotation.
Further I negated your idea of compulsory participation of students in the managerial affairs of the firm. I strictly dont believe in it becoz students are by no means the stakeholders of the firms in real sense. You may have different opinion.
The sort of leniency that you people expect is never desirable. Like what u commented about some friend of yours advised by u to take leave from his firm and join new firm to have a good experience so as to decide whether or not to leave his earlier firm. Students are normally at very early age specially after the introdution of moduler scheme, therefore, they normally mis-use such leniency. Yes, leniency should be expressed in the issues of their personal development and character building. They should be given exam leaves and credit for extra work they do in some job. This normally is done by all good firms, so it is not something to be explored.
In other issues, I dont agree to be lenient.
This must not hurt you as u r not my student and my personal view cannot harm you.
As far s my quotation of Quranic verse, you said u dont find logical reasoning of it. I may remind you that you oftenly dont find logical reasonings of so many things. Now dont mind for these words plz.
Again I may remind you what was the main issue of this thread.
You promised to quote some OC cases.
I will wait for it.
Regards,
Kamran.
