04-21-2006, 11:25 PM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Muhammad Adnan Arshad</i>
<br />Inside Pakistan
ACA > ACCA
Outside Pakistan
ACA < ACCA
In both cases
ACA >=< ACCA
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
ACA (ICAEW) = ACA (ICAP) ..............1
ACCA + 5 years Exp + successful CCAB = ACA (ICAEW) with practice certificate.......2
From 1 and 2 we have
ACCA + (TAX + CLSP) of final = ACA (ICAP) with practice certificate
Seeing the above empirical relation I can assume that the inequality pointed out by Adnan is going to change very soon, provided ICAP does not change its exemption policy for ICAEW members.
Now becoming ACA is as easy as passing ACCA exams. (At least this is what appears to me from the membership form I am working on these days). Unless ICAP revises its exemption scheme, its monopoly of being a sole distributor of charters in Pakistan is in serious danger.
Peace
Asif
<br />Inside Pakistan
ACA > ACCA
Outside Pakistan
ACA < ACCA
In both cases
ACA >=< ACCA
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
ACA (ICAEW) = ACA (ICAP) ..............1
ACCA + 5 years Exp + successful CCAB = ACA (ICAEW) with practice certificate.......2
From 1 and 2 we have
ACCA + (TAX + CLSP) of final = ACA (ICAP) with practice certificate
Seeing the above empirical relation I can assume that the inequality pointed out by Adnan is going to change very soon, provided ICAP does not change its exemption policy for ICAEW members.
Now becoming ACA is as easy as passing ACCA exams. (At least this is what appears to me from the membership form I am working on these days). Unless ICAP revises its exemption scheme, its monopoly of being a sole distributor of charters in Pakistan is in serious danger.
Peace
Asif