03-07-2010, 01:03 PM
Dear Waqas
As Pakistani I know that some of us are quite -ve minded that they do ill wishes for the things they do not have and other have. Such sort of negativity is one of the reasons for our collective state today.
I am not a "tota (parrot) najomi" like them so I don't know about future events.
However, one thing at-least I can say is that CGA and ACCA had quite a good working relationship even before this MRA. So, even if such MRA is terminated in future, CGA would provide maximum possible exemptions to ACCA, which in any case it would NOT provide to Pakistani designations holders. So, don't worry about it and if someone say you this "tota najoomi peshangoi (statement)" next time, just ask his affiliation from the association, and tell him CGA is not going to provide more exemptions to his association even if such MRA is terminated. In any case CGA would provide more exemptions to ACCA MANY MORE THAN to any other designation holder from Pakistan, because CGA has manyfold better working relations with ACCA, comprised of many years as compared with Pakistani associations.
Moreover, all 3 UK associations want presence in North America. So, CIMA has MRA with CMA(Canada), and ICAEW has recognition with CICA, and ACCA has MRA with CGA. Now, why ACCA would terminate MRA when 2 other UK associations would have MRAs with Canadian associations? Why ACCA would lose ground in Canada as compared to CIMA/ICAEW? Similarly, 3 main Canadian associations i.e. CICA, CMA (Canada), and CGA are competitive to each other. Why CGA would terminate such MRA if its competitive bodies (i.e. CICA/CMA) have MRAs with CIMA and ICAEW? Why CGA would increase competitive advantage of its competitive bodies (i.e. CICA/CMA)? Why CGA would lose source of revenues (from ACCA members) when its competitive bodies (CICA/CMA) would be reaping the same with CIMA/ICAEW members? Why CGA would lose its presence in other parts of the world through ACCA members specially in Europe/UK when its competitive bodies (CICA/CMA) would keep through ICAEW/CIMA? So, ask the person who say you such things, what is his/her opinion about CIMA/CMA and ICAEW/CICA mutual recognitions. What do they think about such MRAs. Are they going to terminate too? Why don't they spread such negative rumours about CIMA or ICAEW?
Alas! what a low life such mentaly sick people are. Afsos, ham main say kutch log doosron ki tarraqi nahi daikh saktay, balkay doosron ko tarraqi kartay daikh kar onki tangain khainchtay (leg pulling) hain.
Regards
As Pakistani I know that some of us are quite -ve minded that they do ill wishes for the things they do not have and other have. Such sort of negativity is one of the reasons for our collective state today.
I am not a "tota (parrot) najomi" like them so I don't know about future events.
However, one thing at-least I can say is that CGA and ACCA had quite a good working relationship even before this MRA. So, even if such MRA is terminated in future, CGA would provide maximum possible exemptions to ACCA, which in any case it would NOT provide to Pakistani designations holders. So, don't worry about it and if someone say you this "tota najoomi peshangoi (statement)" next time, just ask his affiliation from the association, and tell him CGA is not going to provide more exemptions to his association even if such MRA is terminated. In any case CGA would provide more exemptions to ACCA MANY MORE THAN to any other designation holder from Pakistan, because CGA has manyfold better working relations with ACCA, comprised of many years as compared with Pakistani associations.
Moreover, all 3 UK associations want presence in North America. So, CIMA has MRA with CMA(Canada), and ICAEW has recognition with CICA, and ACCA has MRA with CGA. Now, why ACCA would terminate MRA when 2 other UK associations would have MRAs with Canadian associations? Why ACCA would lose ground in Canada as compared to CIMA/ICAEW? Similarly, 3 main Canadian associations i.e. CICA, CMA (Canada), and CGA are competitive to each other. Why CGA would terminate such MRA if its competitive bodies (i.e. CICA/CMA) have MRAs with CIMA and ICAEW? Why CGA would increase competitive advantage of its competitive bodies (i.e. CICA/CMA)? Why CGA would lose source of revenues (from ACCA members) when its competitive bodies (CICA/CMA) would be reaping the same with CIMA/ICAEW members? Why CGA would lose its presence in other parts of the world through ACCA members specially in Europe/UK when its competitive bodies (CICA/CMA) would keep through ICAEW/CIMA? So, ask the person who say you such things, what is his/her opinion about CIMA/CMA and ICAEW/CICA mutual recognitions. What do they think about such MRAs. Are they going to terminate too? Why don't they spread such negative rumours about CIMA or ICAEW?
Alas! what a low life such mentaly sick people are. Afsos, ham main say kutch log doosron ki tarraqi nahi daikh saktay, balkay doosron ko tarraqi kartay daikh kar onki tangain khainchtay (leg pulling) hain.
Regards
