10-15-2010, 08:13 PM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Boss</i>
<br />Dear Awais,
Kamran seems to have some jealousy or allergy from you, although i dont know about your past interaction with him, but i observed you do not reply in a way you should respond to him against his posts for you.
This is your good and positive act on the one side, however, it leads to give more chance to him to say some thing against you time and again. You two should either decide to be professional at the forum and act like professionals, or do no post against each other at any thread. Although, this has already been decided earlier at other thread, however, kamran did not act on what he said.
I saw one of the members claiming the same against him that he makes most of the topics into the futile discussion of CA VS ACCA debate at the following thread;
http//www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/topic.asp?topic_id=11717
Seniors should act like seniors, else how would juniors and precursor would react over such actions?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Dear fellow
I could not understand one contradiction in your above post and would be grateful if you can clarify it in some convenient time.
You said
....."although i dont know about your past interaction with him"....
At the same time you also wrote that
........"Although, this has already been decided earlier at other thread, however, kamran did not act on what he said"......
I believe only one of the two above statements can be truthful so I am wondering if you can elucidate.
Further to it, can you please quote my post where I agreed on what you decalred as under
....."kamran did not act on what he said"......
Let me also see what I said and on what I did not act.
Although you are under no obligation to reply, yet, morally a reply should come since the allegation should be explained with evidence and the alleged one should be given an opportunity of being heard in detail.
Regards,
<br />Dear Awais,
Kamran seems to have some jealousy or allergy from you, although i dont know about your past interaction with him, but i observed you do not reply in a way you should respond to him against his posts for you.
This is your good and positive act on the one side, however, it leads to give more chance to him to say some thing against you time and again. You two should either decide to be professional at the forum and act like professionals, or do no post against each other at any thread. Although, this has already been decided earlier at other thread, however, kamran did not act on what he said.
I saw one of the members claiming the same against him that he makes most of the topics into the futile discussion of CA VS ACCA debate at the following thread;
http//www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/topic.asp?topic_id=11717
Seniors should act like seniors, else how would juniors and precursor would react over such actions?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Dear fellow
I could not understand one contradiction in your above post and would be grateful if you can clarify it in some convenient time.
You said
....."although i dont know about your past interaction with him"....
At the same time you also wrote that
........"Although, this has already been decided earlier at other thread, however, kamran did not act on what he said"......
I believe only one of the two above statements can be truthful so I am wondering if you can elucidate.
Further to it, can you please quote my post where I agreed on what you decalred as under
....."kamran did not act on what he said"......
Let me also see what I said and on what I did not act.
Although you are under no obligation to reply, yet, morally a reply should come since the allegation should be explained with evidence and the alleged one should be given an opportunity of being heard in detail.
Regards,
