07-11-2003, 05:55 PM
The word i used back then and still am using and of which u seem to be a bit asahmed of using was 'Bootlicker'. Dear Ozair, the talent of bootlicking is a god-given one and is present in very few special individuals. You don't have to be too humble about this talent of yours! <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
If you say that using this word makes me a gali ka ghunda, then i even shudder to think what that would make you because the rate of your spewing profanities and near-profanities is quite astonishing! <img src=icon_smile_tongue.gif border=0 align=middle>
SBP's (its shareholder's or its director's, doesnt matter, its SBP which always has the last say) policy of selecting a top 3 firm and a minor one alongwith it isnt written, because we all know such things are never documented. But you can see it by experience, HBL, MCB, NBP, UBL, ABL... check out their auditors for the last 10-15 years. You will see it for yourself.
Son, the point regarding copying of working paper files i was making was from a personal experience and have described it in a previous message in which our co-auditors (MYASCO) copied verbatim the working papers of our team from our files to present it to their partners for review because they had spent all their good time eating away client-paid lunches and dinners. The funniest thing is that they were copying the work of their OWN account heads which was allotted to them during engagement planning. Their work was so unreliable (we knew it from past experience) that we had already performed working on MYASCO's heads to get sufficient assurance to help form our audit opinion. Was this the practice of HLB too??!
Regarding appointment of supervisors, i can present to you several living examples where your firm refused to keep their own ppl as supervisors and instead put their trust in 'bahar ka maal'. If this was just because of pure expansion (as you like to put it), MYASCO wouldnt have let go of their own in the first place.
________________________
Arrrgh... it sure's gonna be mighty rough sailin' today ... mates!
If you say that using this word makes me a gali ka ghunda, then i even shudder to think what that would make you because the rate of your spewing profanities and near-profanities is quite astonishing! <img src=icon_smile_tongue.gif border=0 align=middle>
SBP's (its shareholder's or its director's, doesnt matter, its SBP which always has the last say) policy of selecting a top 3 firm and a minor one alongwith it isnt written, because we all know such things are never documented. But you can see it by experience, HBL, MCB, NBP, UBL, ABL... check out their auditors for the last 10-15 years. You will see it for yourself.
Son, the point regarding copying of working paper files i was making was from a personal experience and have described it in a previous message in which our co-auditors (MYASCO) copied verbatim the working papers of our team from our files to present it to their partners for review because they had spent all their good time eating away client-paid lunches and dinners. The funniest thing is that they were copying the work of their OWN account heads which was allotted to them during engagement planning. Their work was so unreliable (we knew it from past experience) that we had already performed working on MYASCO's heads to get sufficient assurance to help form our audit opinion. Was this the practice of HLB too??!
Regarding appointment of supervisors, i can present to you several living examples where your firm refused to keep their own ppl as supervisors and instead put their trust in 'bahar ka maal'. If this was just because of pure expansion (as you like to put it), MYASCO wouldnt have let go of their own in the first place.
________________________
Arrrgh... it sure's gonna be mighty rough sailin' today ... mates!
