03-18-2004, 09:46 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id=quote>quote<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>I think no. of staff and no. or reports qualified are ridiculous criteria.<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" size=2 id=quote>
dear Tim,
Number of staff employed is the important crieteria to rate the firms, as most of the people will try to join the big firm, the firm is said to be the big who is financially strong and be able to hire the large number of employees, and off course financially strong means that they have large number of good paying clients,
and number of reports qualified also increases the reputation of the firm, like somebody said in other forum that there are some firms who are thappafying the accounts, so u can guess the reputation of those firms. <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle>
SMR
dear Tim,
Number of staff employed is the important crieteria to rate the firms, as most of the people will try to join the big firm, the firm is said to be the big who is financially strong and be able to hire the large number of employees, and off course financially strong means that they have large number of good paying clients,
and number of reports qualified also increases the reputation of the firm, like somebody said in other forum that there are some firms who are thappafying the accounts, so u can guess the reputation of those firms. <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle>
SMR