04-06-2009, 07:26 PM
Amir,
The above post is only the jugglery of words to differentiate planted ones and enslaved ones, since in our case both find their roots in materialistic attractions. No body came to enslave any one physically. If we are talking about mental enslavement then it is for the fiscal reasons only, where by we get so many support in various forms for getting into such enslavement.
Our nation became enslaved only for financial reasons to get the worldly facilities without which we can live our lives but we don't want to do so.
Similarly, if I accept your allegation on Geo, even then it has no other clue except the alleged monetary benefits which some group of people might be taking for getting such plantation. However, I don't accept this allegation at all for so many reasons.
So, as far as "being paid" is concerned we all are in the same carrier. If we feel this is something wrong then we have to stimulate our interiors as a nation and have to work from scratch. Otherwise the ones who are indirectly "paid" cannot allege any one for being directly "paid" (in their opinion).
There are only few questions to start with
-can we not live without heavy cars and bungalows.
-can we not survive without luxurious life, facilities and comforts.
-can we not live at our own, to the extent of whatever means we have.
-can we create a balance between imports and exports thereby equating the balance of trade and balance of payment.
-can we not survive without ever increasing debt.
-can we not survive without electricity and utilities (I am not wishing to push the nation into Dark Age. The purpose is to ask can we not cut our requirements short to what we have in place or we can bring into place).
Certainly writing answers to such questions are easier but to implement such answers is more than impossible.
Remember, when you will not be rejecting the concept of relying on others, they will eventually make you to do whatever they like. Beggars cannot dictate their terms. There is no difference in enslavement and plantation in our case. They need not to plant anything. They use our own acts for their purposes and they will be keeping on to use it in future. We Will always keep on searching the planted agents instead of correcting the root causes, since that is the difficult task while declaring planted agents is quite easier.
Mind it, beggars cannot be the choosers!!
The above is only an explanation. As far as Geo is concerned, I don't agree to that forward e-mail message which we both received. I can only request you to develop your own understanding and approach instead of following such forward messages. These are in fact aimed at to divert the thought of our youth and they every time get the success. There is a common feature of every diverting attempt i.e. they always appeal to a general set of mind. You can think over it if you like.
Best regards,
KAMRAN.
The above post is only the jugglery of words to differentiate planted ones and enslaved ones, since in our case both find their roots in materialistic attractions. No body came to enslave any one physically. If we are talking about mental enslavement then it is for the fiscal reasons only, where by we get so many support in various forms for getting into such enslavement.
Our nation became enslaved only for financial reasons to get the worldly facilities without which we can live our lives but we don't want to do so.
Similarly, if I accept your allegation on Geo, even then it has no other clue except the alleged monetary benefits which some group of people might be taking for getting such plantation. However, I don't accept this allegation at all for so many reasons.
So, as far as "being paid" is concerned we all are in the same carrier. If we feel this is something wrong then we have to stimulate our interiors as a nation and have to work from scratch. Otherwise the ones who are indirectly "paid" cannot allege any one for being directly "paid" (in their opinion).
There are only few questions to start with
-can we not live without heavy cars and bungalows.
-can we not survive without luxurious life, facilities and comforts.
-can we not live at our own, to the extent of whatever means we have.
-can we create a balance between imports and exports thereby equating the balance of trade and balance of payment.
-can we not survive without ever increasing debt.
-can we not survive without electricity and utilities (I am not wishing to push the nation into Dark Age. The purpose is to ask can we not cut our requirements short to what we have in place or we can bring into place).
Certainly writing answers to such questions are easier but to implement such answers is more than impossible.
Remember, when you will not be rejecting the concept of relying on others, they will eventually make you to do whatever they like. Beggars cannot dictate their terms. There is no difference in enslavement and plantation in our case. They need not to plant anything. They use our own acts for their purposes and they will be keeping on to use it in future. We Will always keep on searching the planted agents instead of correcting the root causes, since that is the difficult task while declaring planted agents is quite easier.
Mind it, beggars cannot be the choosers!!
The above is only an explanation. As far as Geo is concerned, I don't agree to that forward e-mail message which we both received. I can only request you to develop your own understanding and approach instead of following such forward messages. These are in fact aimed at to divert the thought of our youth and they every time get the success. There is a common feature of every diverting attempt i.e. they always appeal to a general set of mind. You can think over it if you like.
Best regards,
KAMRAN.
