01-01-2011, 06:33 AM
The ignorance that is portrayed is a curse, and it is obvious from foregoing discussion; plus when someone does not try to think at his own and does not apply his mind to probe into a situation on the basis of rationale and facts on ground, it is a disaster which affects the whole professional life. The life that has just taken a first breath.
I wonder if forum rules allow someone to make allegations on renowned persons SIMPLY on the basis of "bala bala said so about a person at bala bala time". If this is a case to be followed then whatever anybody would say about the others should make a basis to put such absurd allegations publicly. Every sane person would agree that this is always untrue and irrational to conclude the things this way.
Allegation should be made if some concrete info is publicly and openly available; and the claimant can prove it solidly and such proof(s) are supported by some verifiable evidence; and without arguing that bala bala said so at bala bala time. Otherwise it is only a yelling and spitting on the sky.
If doing the things that have been done in a couple of posts, i.e. making allegations on Najam Ch. without applying own thought and without making the logical analysis of situation, are called KNOWLEDGE then I should say Alhamdolillah for my IGNORANCE. However, someone should also be warned of the disaster which usually comes the way if such habits and practices are followed in the professional career. It is an advice; earlier the correction is made, the better it is to be.
I have met Najam sb a number of times in professional gatherings but neither I am from AFF nor have any relation with him except of a professional fellow. This allegation was once on-aired by some brainless people but the allegation lost its life sooner being devoid of facts and out-right existence. The analysis of allegation was and is quite easier and anyone who would think on it, after putting the allegation, would face the mirror. It is two plus two equal to four situation. If somebody was powerful enough to even change the policies of a body governed by a huge number of decision makers at the cost of the profession as a whole, why he was not able to get his purpose filled by other means? Was it not quite easier in contrast?
I am still looking forward to be apprised of the so-called powerful positions in the professional or other perspective, so that the genie may come out of the bottle publicly.
I didnot want to mention but may it be necessary to highlight the peculiarity of the fact that a person who was in the circles of profession at the times of Najam Ch. has just qualified his CMA exam in Dec 2010. Is it so? If yes then why? The mindset, vision and approach explain good reasons.
Regards,
I wonder if forum rules allow someone to make allegations on renowned persons SIMPLY on the basis of "bala bala said so about a person at bala bala time". If this is a case to be followed then whatever anybody would say about the others should make a basis to put such absurd allegations publicly. Every sane person would agree that this is always untrue and irrational to conclude the things this way.
Allegation should be made if some concrete info is publicly and openly available; and the claimant can prove it solidly and such proof(s) are supported by some verifiable evidence; and without arguing that bala bala said so at bala bala time. Otherwise it is only a yelling and spitting on the sky.
If doing the things that have been done in a couple of posts, i.e. making allegations on Najam Ch. without applying own thought and without making the logical analysis of situation, are called KNOWLEDGE then I should say Alhamdolillah for my IGNORANCE. However, someone should also be warned of the disaster which usually comes the way if such habits and practices are followed in the professional career. It is an advice; earlier the correction is made, the better it is to be.
I have met Najam sb a number of times in professional gatherings but neither I am from AFF nor have any relation with him except of a professional fellow. This allegation was once on-aired by some brainless people but the allegation lost its life sooner being devoid of facts and out-right existence. The analysis of allegation was and is quite easier and anyone who would think on it, after putting the allegation, would face the mirror. It is two plus two equal to four situation. If somebody was powerful enough to even change the policies of a body governed by a huge number of decision makers at the cost of the profession as a whole, why he was not able to get his purpose filled by other means? Was it not quite easier in contrast?
I am still looking forward to be apprised of the so-called powerful positions in the professional or other perspective, so that the genie may come out of the bottle publicly.
I didnot want to mention but may it be necessary to highlight the peculiarity of the fact that a person who was in the circles of profession at the times of Najam Ch. has just qualified his CMA exam in Dec 2010. Is it so? If yes then why? The mindset, vision and approach explain good reasons.
Regards,
